Literature DB >> 26843742

Evaluation of flexural strength of resin interim restorations impregnated with various types of silane treated and untreated glass fibres.

K S Naveen1, J P Singh2, M Viswambaran3, R K Dhiman4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flexural strength is an important mechanical property that determines the long-term prognosis of interim restorations. Studies are lacking regarding the effect of silanation of the various types of glass fibre impregnation on the flexural strength of resin interim restorations.
METHODS: A customized metal die was milled to simulate the prepared abutments of a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis. A total of seventy five samples of interim fixed dental prostheses were prepared using autopolymerizing tooth colour acrylic resin. Unidirectional and woven forms of glass fibres (Stick and Stick Net), which were silane treated and untreated were used to reinforce the resin matrix. Fifteen samples were prepared for each group along with unreinforced group serving as control. The flexural strength was evaluated with universal testing machine.
RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of flexural strength for different groups were 13.90 ± 2.96 (control), 61.58 ± 5.26 (unidirectional fibres), 30.89 ± 3.60 (woven fibres), 112.05 ± 5.51 (silane treated unidirectional fibres) and 73.85 ± 4.10 (silane treated woven fibres) respectively. The mean flexural strength of silane treated unidirectional fibres (112.05 MPa) was highest and statistically highly significant (P < 0.0001) compared to all other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the current study, flexural strength of the reinforced PMMA interim fixed dental prosthesis was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) when compared to the unreinforced PMMA interim fixed dental prosthesis. The use of silane treated unidirectional glass fibres is an effective method of reinforcing interim fixed restorations made of PMMA resins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexural strength; Glass fibres; Silane coupling agent

Year:  2012        PMID: 26843742      PMCID: PMC4705101          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  18 in total

1.  Effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the flexural strength of different denture base resins.

Authors:  Cemal Aydin; Handan Yilmaz; Alper Cağlar
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.677

2.  Effect of cross-sectional design on the modulus of elasticity and toughness of fiber-reinforced composite materials.

Authors:  Scott R Dyer; Lippo V J Lassila; Mikko Jokinen; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The bond strength of particulate-filler composite to differently oriented fiber-reinforced composite substrate.

Authors:  Lippo V J Lassila; Arzu Tezvergil; Scott R Dyer; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  The effect of plasma-treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of polymethyl methacrylate.

Authors:  V Ramos; D A Runyan; L C Christensen
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the fracture resistance of a provisional fixed partial denture.

Authors:  P K Vallittu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Flexural strength of provisional restorative materials.

Authors:  Y I Osman; C P Owen
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Epoxy/carbon composite resins in dentistry: mechanical properties related to fiber reinforcements.

Authors:  G Viguie; G Malquarti; B Vincent; D Bourgeois
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Acrylic resin-fiber composite--Part II: The effect of polymerization shrinkage of polymethyl methacrylate applied to fiber roving on transverse strength.

Authors:  P K Vallittu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  The effect of fiber reinforcement on the fracture toughness and flexural strength of provisional restorative resins.

Authors:  Tamer A Hamza; Stephen F Rosenstiel; Mohamed M Elhosary; Rabab M Ibraheem
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 10.  A review of methods used to reinforce polymethyl methacrylate resin.

Authors:  P K Vallittu
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.752

View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparative study to check fracture strength of provisional fixed partial dentures made of autopolymerizing polymethylmethacrylate resin reinforced with different materials: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Parikshit Gupt; Archana Nagpal; Rupandeep Kaur Samra; Ramit Verma; Jasjeet Kaur; Surbhi Abrol
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

Review 2.  Review on Polymer, Ceramic and Composite Materials for CAD/CAM Indirect Restorations in Dentistry-Application, Mechanical Characteristics and Comparison.

Authors:  Aleksandra Skorulska; Paweł Piszko; Zbigniew Rybak; Maria Szymonowicz; Maciej Dobrzyński
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.