Literature DB >> 8364534

Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension.

J E Moravcsik1, W Kintsch.   

Abstract

Subjects listened to and recalled three passages. Each subject was also given a general reading comprehension test. The passages were presented either in such a way that subjects could use their general knowledge to help understand them, or in such a way that no specific world knowledge seemed applicable. This was achieved by giving the passages a helpful title, versus no title or an unhelpful title. The passages were written in two different versions, preserving their content but varying their style. In one version, the language was as helpful as we could make it in signalling to the listener discourse importance, while in the other version the language was as unhelpful as we could make it while still writing an English text. All three factors--domain knowledge, writing style, and skill--significantly affected reproductive recall, and there were no interactions between these factors. However, while good writing was sufficient to improve the reproduction of the texts, an analysis of the recall elaborations subjects made revealed that the correctness of their elaborations depended strongly on the availability of appropriate domain knowledge. Thus, good writing and domain knowledge are not simply substitutable, but affect comprehension in somewhat different ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8364534     DOI: 10.1037/h0078823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  8 in total

1.  Long-term working memory in text production.

Authors:  R T Kellogg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  Retrieving text inferences: controlled and automatic influences.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Gilbert Remillard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

Review 3.  Aging and self-regulated language processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Contextual knowledge reduces demands on working memory during reading.

Authors:  Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Jason A Cohen; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

5.  Perspective effects in repeated reading: an eye movement study.

Authors:  Johanna K Kaakinen; Jukka Hyönä
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

6.  The importance of knowledge in vivid text memory: an individual-differences investigation of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel Prat; Clinton Johns; Phillip Morris; Eunike Jonathan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

7.  Understanding the Influence of Text Complexity and Question Type on Reading Outcomes.

Authors:  Mercedes Spencer; Allison F Gilmour; Amanda C Miller; Angela M Emerson; Neena M Saha; Laurie E Cutting
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2018-07-09

8.  A memory-retrieval view of discourse representation: The recollection and familiarity of text ideas.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Clinton L Johns; Eunike Jonathan
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.