Literature DB >> 8363398

Outcomes of cryosurgery in keloids and hypertrophic scars. A prospective consecutive trial of case series.

C C Zouboulis1, U Blume, P Büttner, C E Orfanos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
DESIGN: A variety of therapeutic regimens has been used in keloids and hypertrophic scars with unsatisfactory final results. Application of cryosurgery could be beneficial since it was reported to produce less scarring after treatment of skin tumors compared with other surgical procedures. We performed a prospective consecutive trial of randomly enrolled case series including 32 months of average follow-up to assess the outcomes of cryosurgical treatment in keloids and hypertrophic scars and to determine factors influencing the therapeutic result. Ninety-three white patients, aged 10 to 79 years (median age, 26 years) with keloids (n = 55; median duration, 36 months; median size, 4 cm2) and with hypertrophic scars (n = 38; median duration, 12 months; median size, 2 cm2) were treated using the contact method. One freeze-thaw cycle of 30 seconds per lesion and session was employed, and, if needed, treatment was repeated every 20 to 30 days.
RESULTS: Excellent responses (ER) were recorded in 30 subjects (32.3%), good responses (GR) in 27 (29.0%), poor responses (PR) in 27 (29.0%), while nine subjects (9.7%) did not respond at all. Hypertrophic scars responded better (n = 38; GR to ER, 76.3%) than keloids (n = 55; GR to ER, 50.9%; P < .005; odds ratio, 6.92). No progressions or recurrences occurred. Histologically, neovascularization, loss of the anarchic arrangement of collagen bundles, increased fibroblasts in a stroma running parallel to the skin surface, and mononuclear cells mostly arranged at the perivascular area were found in clinically responding lesions. Improved responses were detected in subjects treated with three or more sessions (n = 57; GR to ER, 78.9%) compared with subjects treated once or twice (n = 36; GR to ER, 33.3%; P < .001; odds ratio, 13.68). The cryosurgical treatment was generally well tolerated, with local pain during freezing and/or shortly after treatment (n = 32, 34.4%) and hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation (n = 11, 11.8%) being the most frequent side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Cryosurgery was found effective and safe in keloids and, especially, in hypertrophic scars, in an open, uncontrolled study. Satisfactory results could be obtained after at least three cryosurgical sessions of 30 seconds each, applied once monthly using the contact method of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8363398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  25 in total

Review 1.  Cryosurgery for common skin lesions. Treatment in family physicians' offices.

Authors:  S J Wetmore
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies.

Authors:  Gerd G Gauglitz; Hans C Korting; Tatiana Pavicic; Thomas Ruzicka; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 3.  [Cryosurgery in dermatology].

Authors:  C C Zouboulis
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Use of intralesional cryosurgery as an innovative therapy for keloid scars and a review of current treatments.

Authors:  Gary Goldenberg; Adam J Luber
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2013-07

5.  Cryotherapy: A Successful Monotherapy for Earlobe Keloids.

Authors:  A M Muthanna; Y A Al-Qubati
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 6.  [Keloid and hypertrophic scar treatment modalities. An update].

Authors:  L K Branski; H O Rennekampff; P M Vogt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  [Hyperplastic scars and keloids. Part I: basics and prevention].

Authors:  A Baisch; F Riedel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 8.  Current Advances in Hypertrophic Scar and Keloid Management.

Authors:  Natasha Barone; Tyler Safran; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Peter G Davison; Sabrina Cugno; Amanda M Murphy
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.195

9.  Cryotherapy in treatment of keloids: evaluation of factors affecting treatment outcome.

Authors:  Meenu Barara; Vibhu Mendiratta; Ram Chander
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-07

10.  Management of keloids and hypertrophic scars: current and emerging options.

Authors:  Gerd G Gauglitz
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2013-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.