Literature DB >> 3559991

Human ocular vergence movements induced by changing size and disparity.

C J Erkelens, D Regan.   

Abstract

Human subjects viewed an electronically generated bright square. Horizontal movements of the two eyes were recorded with the scleral coil method. The dynamic properties of vergence movements induced by movement of the bright square were investigated for the following three kinds of stimulus motion: (a) both the size and the binocular disparity of the square changed together, in such a way as to exactly mimic the retinal image changes produced by a real object's motion in depth; (b) the changing-size component in (a) was present with no disparity component; (c) the changing-disparity component in (a) was present with no size component. The gain and phase of the ocular vergence responses to these three stimuli were computed. Ocular vergence movements were induced by changing size in all five subjects. Responses during binocular viewing were higher and less variable than responses during monocular viewing. Size oscillations induced ocular vergence oscillations with a phase lead of up to 65 deg relative to target size for frequencies of stimulation below 1.0 Hz. Vergence oscillation amplitudes were of the order of 10 min of arc and maximal for frequencies of 0.4-0.7 Hz. Ocular vergence movements were not induced by changes in target size in one dimension nor by flickering a stationary square. Ocular vergence movements induced by size changes were entirely transient with no sustained component: vergence responses to disparity were sustained. When the stimulus combined size change with disparity change in the ratio characteristic of a real moving object, vergence tracking was more accurate and less noisy than when the eyes were stimulated with the disparity component alone. The ocular vergence response induced by the combination of size change with disparity change was accurately predicted by linearly adding the vergence response produced by the size change alone to the vergence response produced by the disparity change alone: combined stimulation produced no evidence of non-linear interaction between responses to size change and to disparity change. The properties of vergence responses induced by changing size and by changing disparity showed several close correlations with the corresponding data on psychophysical sensitivity for motion-in-depth sensation. We suggest that responses to changing size contribute to the accuracy with which ocular vergence tracks real objects moving in depth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3559991      PMCID: PMC1182889          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  31 in total

1.  Precise recording of human eye movements.

Authors:  H Collewijn; F van der Mark; T C Jansen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  An analysis of latencies and prediction in the fusional vergence system.

Authors:  V V Krishnan; F Farazian; L Stark
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1973-12

3.  Evidence for the existence of neural mechanisms selectively sensitive to the direction of movement in space.

Authors:  K I Beverley; D Regan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage.

Authors:  D Regan; K I Beverley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Neurons in area 18 of cat visual cortex selectively sensitive to changing size: nonlinear interactions between responses to two edges.

Authors:  D Regan; M Cynader
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Visual sensitivity to the shape and size of a moving object: implications for models of object perception.

Authors:  K I Beverley; D Regan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Dynamic contributions of the components of binocular vergence.

Authors:  J Semmlow; P Wetzel
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-05

8.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway.

Authors:  D Regan; K I Beverley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Binocular eye movements during accommodative vergence.

Authors:  R V Kenyon; K J Ciuffreda; L Stark
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Neurones in cat parastriate cortex sensitive to the direction of motion in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  M Cynader; D Regan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  11 in total

1.  Vergence responses to forward motion in monkeys: visual modulation at ultra-short latencies.

Authors:  Yasushi Kodaka; Yoshiro Wada; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Control of vergence: gating among disparity inputs by voluntary target selection.

Authors:  C J Erkelens; H Collewijn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Human vergence eye movements to oblique disparity stimuli: evidence for an anisotropy favoring horizontal disparities.

Authors:  H A Rambold; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection.

Authors:  Raymond van Ee; Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Amanda L Parker; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Adaptation of ocular vergence to stimulation with large disparities.

Authors:  C J Erkelens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker.

Authors:  Cheng S Qian; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Binocular eye movements evoked by self-induced motion parallax.

Authors:  Jared Frey; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Organizational factors and the perception of motion in depth.

Authors:  D H Mershon; T A Jones; M E Taylor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

9.  Sensitivity of vergence responses of 5- to 10-week-old human infants.

Authors:  Eric S Seemiller; Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Accommodation and vergence response gains to different near cues characterize specific esotropias.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.