Literature DB >> 8361831

Haptic identification of objects and their depictions.

R L Klatzky1, J M Loomis, S J Lederman, H Wake, N Fujita.   

Abstract

Haptic identification of real objects is superior to that of raised two-dimensional (2-D) depictions. Three explanations of real-object superiority were investigated: contribution of material information, contribution of 3-D shape and size, and greater potential for integration across the fingers. In Experiment 1, subjects, while wearing gloves that gently attenuated material information, haptically identified real objects that provided reduced cues to compliance, mass, and part motion. The gloves permitted exploration with free hand movement, a single outstretched finger, or five outstretched fingers. Performance decreased over these three conditions but was superior to identification of pictures of the same objects in all cases, indicating the contribution of 3-D structure and integration across the fingers. Picture performance was also better with five fingers than with one. In Experiment 2, the subjects wore open-fingered gloves, which provided them with material information. Consequently, the effect of type of exploration was substantially reduced but not eliminated. Material compensates somewhat for limited access to object structure but is not the primary basis for haptic object identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8361831     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Haptic classification of common objects: knowledge-driven exploration.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R L Klatzky
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view.

Authors:  J M Loomis; R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R L Klatzky; C Chataway; C D Summers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-01

4.  Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition.

Authors:  I Biederman; G Ju
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch.

Authors:  M T Turvey; G Burton; E L Amazeen; M Butwill; C Carello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and the blind: the advantage of the late blind.

Authors:  M A Heller
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Attending to two fingers: two hands are better than one.

Authors:  J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-12

9.  Objects, parts, and categories.

Authors:  B Tversky; K Hemenway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-06

10.  Identifying objects by touch: an "expert system".

Authors:  R L Klatzky; S J Lederman; V A Metzger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04
View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

2.  The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on cross-modal object recognition.

Authors:  Andrew T Woods; Sile O'Modhrain; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Haptic object perception: spatial dimensionality and relation to vision.

Authors:  Roberta L Klatzky; Susan J Lederman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Effects of vision and haptics on categorizing common objects.

Authors:  Susan Haag
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-08-19

5.  Haptic search with finger movements: using more fingers does not necessarily reduce search times.

Authors:  K E Overvliet; J B J Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Discrimination is not impaired when more cortical space between two electro-tactile markers increases perceived duration.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kuroda; Simon Grondin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Identifying objects from a haptic glance.

Authors:  R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

Review 8.  The role of self-touch in somatosensory and body representation disorders after stroke.

Authors:  H E van Stralen; M J E van Zandvoort; H C Dijkerman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Multimodal Interactions between Proprioceptive and Cutaneous Signals in Primary Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  Sung Soo Kim; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Pramodsingh H Thakur; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Perception of tactile graphics: embossings versus cutouts.

Authors:  Amy Kalia; Rose Hopkins; David Jin; Lindsay Yazzolino; Svena Verma; Lotfi Merabet; Flip Phillips; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.286

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.