Literature DB >> 25296474

Perception of tactile graphics: embossings versus cutouts.

Amy Kalia, Rose Hopkins, David Jin, Lindsay Yazzolino, Svena Verma, Lotfi Merabet, Flip Phillips, Pawan Sinha.   

Abstract

Graphical information, such as illustrations, graphs, and diagrams, are an essential complement to text for conveying knowledge about the world. Although graphics can be communicated well via the visual modality, conveying this information via touch has proven to be challenging. The lack of easily comprehensible tactile graphics poses a problem for the blind. In this paper, we advance a hypothesis for the limited effectiveness of tactile graphics. The hypothesis contends that conventional graphics that rely upon embossings on two-dimensional surfaces do not allow the deployment of tactile exploratory procedures that are crucial for assessing global shape. Besides potentially accounting for some of the shortcomings of current approaches, this hypothesis also serves a prescriptive purpose by suggesting a different strategy for conveying graphical information via touch, one based on cutouts. We describe experiments demonstrating the greater effectiveness of this approach for conveying shape and identity information. These results hold the potential for creating more comprehensible tactile drawings for the visually impaired while also providing insights into shape estimation processes in the tactile modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25296474      PMCID: PMC5757243          DOI: 10.1163/22134808-00002450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multisens Res        ISSN: 2213-4794            Impact factor:   2.286


  13 in total

1.  Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view.

Authors:  J M Loomis; R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  The role of pictorial convention in haptic picture perception.

Authors:  Leanne J Thompson; Edward P Chronicle; Alan F Collins
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R L Klatzky; C Chataway; C D Summers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-01

4.  Look what I have felt: unidentified haptic line drawings are identified after sketching.

Authors:  Maarten W A Wijntjes; Thijs van Lienen; Ilse M Verstijnen; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-04-02

5.  Tactile picture recognition: errors are in shape acquistion or object matching?

Authors:  Amy A Kalia; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2012

6.  Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and the blind: the advantage of the late blind.

Authors:  M A Heller
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Haptic identification of objects and their depictions.

Authors:  R L Klatzky; J M Loomis; S J Lederman; H Wake; N Fujita
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

Review 8.  Tactile pattern perception.

Authors:  J M Loomis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  Tactual picture identification by blind and sighted people: effects of providing categorical information.

Authors:  M A Heller; J A Calcaterra; L L Burson; L A Tyler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.