Literature DB >> 8359251

A perceptual analysis of viscosity.

L A Jones1, I W Hunter.   

Abstract

The perception of viscosity was studied using the contralateral limb-matching procedure in which subjects adjusted the viscosity of a motor connected to the wrist of one (matching) arm until it was perceived to be the same as that of the motor attached to the other (reference) arm. Two servo-controlled electromagnetic linear motors with computer-controlled viscosity were used to present viscosities ranging in amplitude from 2 to 1024 N.s/m to 11 subjects. Ten different viscosities were matched by subjects, and there were ten repetitions of each stimulus amplitude. The psychophysical function relating the reference to matching viscosity was linear (99% variance accounted for), and the accuracy with which the viscosities were matched (slope of 0.88) paralleled that reported previously for force, limb position and stiffness. The Weber fraction for viscosity was 0.34, which is 50% larger than that measured for stiffness and over twice that reported for force. An analysis of the movements and forces generated to perceive the reference viscosity revealed that subjects did not vary the amplitude of the movements and typically made very small excursions of the forearm, but that both the velocity of the movements and force changed significantly as a function of the reference viscosity. These findings were interpreted as indicating that the human proprioceptive system is capable of integrating information regarding force and movement velocity so as to perceive the viscosity of a mechanical system connected to the limbs, but that its sensitivity to changes in viscosity is much less than would be predicted from its capacity to detect variations in muscle force and limb movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8359251     DOI: 10.1007/bf00230304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Matching forces: constant errors and differential thresholds.

Authors:  L A Jones
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 2.  Perception of force and weight: theory and research.

Authors:  L A Jones
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Proprioception with the proximal interphalangeal joint of the index finger. Evidence for a movement sense without a static-position sense.

Authors:  F J Clark; R C Burgess; J W Chapin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Position dependence of ankle joint dynamics--I. Passive mechanics.

Authors:  P L Weiss; R E Kearney; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Judgment and control of velocity in rapid voluntary movements.

Authors:  T E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Proprioceptive sensation at the terminal joint of the middle finger.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; L A Hall; D I McCloskey; E K Potter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  The mammalian muscle spindle and its central control.

Authors:  M Hulliger
Journal:  Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.545

8.  Changes in motor commands, as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man. Evidence for a peripherally originating muscular sense and for a sense of effort.

Authors:  P E Roland; H Ladegaard-Pedersen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position.

Authors:  F J Clark; R C Burgess; J W Chapin; W T Lipscomb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  4 in total

1.  Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the roles of force and work cues.

Authors:  H Z Tan; N I Durlach; G L Beauregard; M A Srinivasan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

2.  Stretching the skin immediately enhances perceived stiffness and gradually enhances the predictive control of grip force.

Authors:  Mor Farajian; Raz Leib; Hanna Kossowsky; Tomer Zaidenberg; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Tactile-STAR: A Novel Tactile STimulator And Recorder System for Evaluating and Improving Tactile Perception.

Authors:  Giulia Ballardini; Giorgio Carlini; Psiche Giannoni; Robert A Scheidt; Ilana Nisky; Maura Casadio
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  The tactile perception of transient changes in friction.

Authors:  David Gueorguiev; Eric Vezzoli; André Mouraux; Betty Lemaire-Semail; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.118

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.