Literature DB >> 3790974

Proprioception with the proximal interphalangeal joint of the index finger. Evidence for a movement sense without a static-position sense.

F J Clark, R C Burgess, J W Chapin.   

Abstract

Proprioceptive ability with the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the index finger in human subjects was examined using a method that could assess static-position sense independently of movement sense (Clark et al., 1985). The similarity in location and function of these joints would suggest similar proprioceptive mechanisms, but proprioceptive ability was found to be quite different for the two joints. The method of distinguishing a static-position sense from a movement sense was based on whether a subject's ability to detect a small change in joint position was impaired when the rate of rotation was progressively reduced. An awareness of static-position should not depend on the rate at which a joint is placed into position. However, if subjects use movement signals to detect changes in joint position, slowing the rate of displacement should reduce the intensity of these signals and make the displacements more difficult to detect. This method indicated a static-position sense with the MCP joint but only a movement sense with the PIP joint. It was confirmed that sensory input from regions of skin not stretched or deformed by rotation of the joint can influence proprioceptive sensibility with the fingers. Anaesthesia of the tip of the index finger or of the thumb blunted subject's perceptions of movement of the PIP joint of the index finger. However, anaesthesia of the PIP joint itself had no observable effect on the ability to sense movement of the joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3790974     DOI: 10.1093/brain/109.6.1195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  20 in total

1.  Proprioceptive population coding of limb position in humans.

Authors:  Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Mikael Bergenheim; Frédéric Albert; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The detection of human finger movement is not facilitated by input from receptors in adjacent digits.

Authors:  K M Refshauge; D F Collins; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Differential thresholds for limb movement measured using adaptive techniques.

Authors:  L A Jones; I W Hunter; R J Irwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

4.  Detection of simultaneous movement at two human arm joints.

Authors:  Daina L Sturnieks; Julie R Wright; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Where is your arm? Variations in proprioception across space and tasks.

Authors:  Christina T Fuentes; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: the roles of force and work cues.

Authors:  H Z Tan; N I Durlach; G L Beauregard; M A Srinivasan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-05

7.  Movement detection at the human big toe.

Authors:  K M Refshauge; J L Taylor; D I McCloskey; M Gianoutsos; P Mathews; R C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Models of behaviors when detecting displacements of joints.

Authors:  F J Clark; K A Deffenbacher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Factors affecting the accuracy of position matching at the proximal interphalangeal joint in human subjects.

Authors:  W R Ferrell; S E Milne
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Joint receptors and kinaesthesia.

Authors:  U Proske; H G Schaible; R F Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.