Literature DB >> 8359239

The temporary inactivation of the red nucleus affects performance of both conditioned and unconditioned nictitating membrane responses in the rabbit.

V Bracha1, S L Stewart, J R Bloedel.   

Abstract

These experiments are part of a series of studies examining the role of the red nucleus in the performance of the conditioned and unconditioned nictitating membrane reflexes in the rabbit. Specifically, the experiments test the hypothesis that the temporary inactivation of the red nucleus selectively affects the performance of the conditioned reflex. The experiments were designed to assess the effects of lidocaine and control saline microinjections on conditioned as well as unconditioned responses in both paired and unpaired trials. Rabbits were chronically implanted with cannulae through which small injecting tubes were passed stereotaxically to the red nucleus. The animals were conditioned using a delay paradigm in which a 1 kHz tone and an air puff applied to the cornea were used as the unconditioned and conditioned stimulus, respectively. Once conditioned, the effects of either lidocaine or saline injection were evaluated while alternating paired trials with unpaired trials in which only the air puff was applied. The principal finding of this study was that the amplitudes of both the conditioned and unconditioned responses were reduced following lidocaine injection into the red nucleus. The effect on the unconditioned response amplitude could not be ascribed to any interaction between the conditioned and unconditioned responses, since it also was present in the unpaired trials. The reduction in amplitude of the conditioned and unconditioned responses was shown to be correlated with changes in other characteristics of the same responses. The data suggest that the red nucleus contributes to the performance of both the conditioned and unconditioned nictitating membrane reflexes and consequently is not likely to be involved only in pathways responsible for mediating and/or storing the engram for the conditioned reflex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8359239     DOI: 10.1007/bf00230290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  Autoradiographic estimation of the extent of reversible inactivation produced by microinjection of lidocaine and muscimol in the rat.

Authors:  J H Martin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1991-06-24       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Cerebellar lesions and the nictitating membrane reflex: performance deficits of the conditioned and unconditioned response.

Authors:  J P Welsh; J A Harvey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Modulatory influences of red nucleus stimulation on the somatosensory responses of cat trigeminal subnucleus oralis neurons.

Authors:  K D Davis; J O Dostrovsky
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Motor deficit induced by red nucleus lesion: re-appraisal using kainic acid destructions.

Authors:  F Levesque; M Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response.

Authors:  D A McCormick; R F Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Neuronal responses of the rabbit brainstem during performance of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane (NM)/eyelid response.

Authors:  D A McCormick; D G Lavond; R F Thompson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-07-18       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Axonal patterns and sites of termination of cat superior colliculus neurons projecting in the tecto-bulbo-spinal tract.

Authors:  A Grantyn; R Grantyn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit. I. Lesions of the cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  C H Yeo; M J Hardiman; M Glickstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Single-unit activity in red nucleus during the classically conditioned rabbit nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  J E Desmond; J W Moore
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.304

10.  Evidence for a role of haloperidol-sensitive sigma-'opiate' receptors in the motor effects of antipsychotic drugs.

Authors:  J M Walker; R R Matsumoto; W D Bowen; D L Gans; K D Jones; F O Walker
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neuronal responses to 5-hydroxytryptamine in the red nucleus of rats.

Authors:  F Licata; G Li Volsi; G Maugeri; F Santangelo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Bilateral disruption of conditioned responses after unilateral blockade of cerebellar output in the decerebrate ferret.

Authors:  M Ivarsson; P Svensson; G Hesslow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Lid restraint evokes two types of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Edward J Schicatano; Jessica Mantzouranis; Kavita R Peshori; Jill Partin; Craig Evinger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of muscimol inactivation of the cerebellar interposed-dentate nuclear complex on the performance of the nictitating membrane response in the rabbit.

Authors:  V Bracha; M L Webster; N K Winters; K B Irwin; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Electrical Stimulation Evokes Rotational Behavior In Tandem with Exocytotic-like Increases in Dopamine Measured by In Vivo Intracerebral Microdialysis.

Authors:  Alice H Grant; Mabel A Terminel; Jeremiah Ramos; Luisa F Alatorre; Edward Castañeda
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Recruitment in retractor bulbi muscle during eyeblink conditioning: EMG analysis and common-drive model.

Authors:  N F Lepora; J Porrill; C H Yeo; C Evinger; P Dean
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.