Literature DB >> 1652721

Single-unit activity in red nucleus during the classically conditioned rabbit nictitating membrane response.

J E Desmond1, J W Moore.   

Abstract

Previous investigations have suggested that the cerebellum and associated brainstem structures, including the red nucleus, are essential for the expression of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane (NM) response. The present study examined the firing patterns of extracellularly-recorded single units in the red nucleus of the awake rabbit during differential conditioning. Tones were used as conditioned stimulus (CS+ and CS-) and periocular electrostimulation was used as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Most units exhibited one or more changes in firing rate during the presentation of the CS, and increases in firing were much more common than decreases. The onset of some of these changes appeared to be time-locked to the onset of the CS ('CS-locked' responses), while other changes were time-locked to the onset of the CR ('CR-locked' responses). About one-third of all CS-locked changes were CR-dependent, meaning that the neuronal response was reduced when the CR did not occur. About two-thirds of all CR-locked responses preceded the onset of the CR, and lead times varied considerably across units. Many CR-locked units were located in what has been described as a dorsal face region of the red nucleus. Most units responded to the US, and some of the US responses were CR-dependent: i.e., a smaller US response was evoked when a CR preceded the US than when the CR was absent. Our results support the notion that cerebellum-brainstem circuits are involved in generating NM CRs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1652721     DOI: 10.1016/0168-0102(91)90083-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0168-0102            Impact factor:   3.304


  6 in total

1.  The cerebellum and red nucleus are not required for In vitro classical conditioning of the turtle abducens nerve response.

Authors:  C W Anderson; J Keifer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Inactivation of cerebellar output axons impairs acquisition of conditioned eyeblinks.

Authors:  W U Nilaweera; G D Zenitsky; V Bracha
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Neural circuitry and plasticity mechanisms underlying delay eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Adam B Steinmetz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  The temporary inactivation of the red nucleus affects performance of both conditioned and unconditioned nictitating membrane responses in the rabbit.

Authors:  V Bracha; S L Stewart; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Blocking GABAA neurotransmission in the interposed nuclei: effects on conditioned and unconditioned eyeblinks.

Authors:  Krystal L Parker; Svitlana Zbarska; Andrew J Carrel; Vlastislav Bracha
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Recruitment in retractor bulbi muscle during eyeblink conditioning: EMG analysis and common-drive model.

Authors:  N F Lepora; J Porrill; C H Yeo; C Evinger; P Dean
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.