Literature DB >> 8359001

Clinical assessment of anaerobic isolates from blood cultures.

S E Sharp1, J C McLaughlin, J M Goodman, J Moore, S M Spanos, D W Keller, R J Poppiti.   

Abstract

Patients at two tertiary-care medical centers were evaluated to determine the clinical significance of anaerobic isolates from their blood specimens and to identify whether aerobic and/or anaerobic conditions were necessary for the detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. Significant anaerobes were isolated from only 0.1% and 0.4% of all blood cultures collected. The majority of patients with significant anaerobes had clinical conditions in which anaerobes are known to cause infections. Of the S. pneumoniae organisms, 83% were isolated only from the aerobic bottles of a blood culture set. These data lend support to the recommendations for the selective ordering of anaerobic blood cultures without compromising the isolation of S. pneumoniae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8359001     DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90064-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  12 in total

1.  Controlled clinical comparison of BACTEC plus anaerobic/F to standard anaerobic/F as the anaerobic companion bottle to plus aerobic/F medium for culturing blood from adults.

Authors:  M L Wilson; S Mirrett; F T Meredith; M P Weinstein; V Scotto; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  L G Reimer; M L Wilson; M P Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Advantage of combining resin with lytic BACTEC blood culture media.

Authors:  P Rohner; B Pepey; R Auckenthaler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  The Addition of Anaerobic Blood Cultures for Pediatric Patients with Concerns for Bloodstream Infections: Prevalence and Time to Positive Cultures.

Authors:  Jennifer Dien Bard; Todd P Chang; Rebecca Yee; Keya Manshadi; Nhan Lichtenfeld; Hee Jae Choi; Ara Festekjian
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of BACTEC plus aerobic/F resin medium with BacT/Alert aerobic FAN medium for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; S Mirrett; L C McDonald; P R Murray; M P Weinstein; J Fune; C W Trippy; M Masterson; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Predominance of Enterobacteriaceae isolates in early positive anaerobic blood culture bottles in BacT/Alert system.

Authors:  Tzong-Shi Chiueh; Shih-Yi Lee; Sheng-Hui Tang; Jang-Jih Lu; Jun-Ren Sun
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Comparison of recovery of blood culture isolates from two BacT/ALERT FAN aerobic blood culture bottles with recovery from one FAN aerobic bottle and one FAN anaerobic bottle.

Authors:  Julie A Riley; Barbara J Heiter; Paul P Bourbeau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of bacterial and yeast species with the Bactec 9120 automated system with routine use of aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal media.

Authors:  Alfredo Chiarini; Angelo Palmeri; Teresa Amato; Rita Immordino; Salvatore Distefano; Anna Giammanco
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Clinical comparison of isolator and thiol broth with ESP aerobic and anaerobic bottles for recovery of pathogens from blood.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; D A Bankert; J P Manzella; K S Parsey; S L Scott; S H Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Risk factors for mortality in patients with anaerobic bacteremia.

Authors:  J R Wilson; A P Limaye
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.