Literature DB >> 12517851

Comparison of recovery of blood culture isolates from two BacT/ALERT FAN aerobic blood culture bottles with recovery from one FAN aerobic bottle and one FAN anaerobic bottle.

Julie A Riley1, Barbara J Heiter, Paul P Bourbeau.   

Abstract

Traditionally, a routine blood culture for adult patients consisted of paired aerobic and anaerobic bottles, but the routine use of an anaerobic blood culture bottle has been challenged in recent years. In this study, we compared the recovery of two FAN aerobic bottles with one FAN aerobic and one FAN anaerobic bottle. Each pair of bottles was collected by a separate collection procedure, and each bottle held a recommended 8- to 12-ml draw. A total of 704 clinically significant isolates were recovered from 8,620 sets (17,240 pairs), with 487 (69.2%) isolates recovered from one or both bottles in each pair of bottles, 86 isolates (12.2%) recovered only from the FAN aerobic-FAN aerobic pair, and 131 isolates (18.6%) recovered only from the FAN aerobic-FAN anaerobic pair. Significantly more total organisms (P = 0.002), gram-positive cocci (P = 0.03), Staphylococcus aureus (P = 0.05), Enterobacteriaceae other than Escherichia coli (P = 0.02), and anaerobes (P = 0.01) were recovered from the FAN aerobic-FAN anaerobic pair than from the FAN aerobic-FAN aerobic pair. A separate analysis was performed on the 618 isolates that were recovered from the FAN aerobic-FAN anaerobic pair to compare recovery by bottle type. Significantly more S. aureus (P = 0.005) and anaerobes (P < 0.001) were recovered from the FAN anaerobic bottle, while significantly more coagulase-negative staphylococci (P = 0.01), Streptococcus pneumoniae (P = 0.03), and other gram-negative bacilli (P = 0.004) were recovered from the FAN aerobic bottle. These results support the routine use of a FAN anaerobic bottle for use in the culture of blood with the BacT/ALERT system in our institution. These results also suggest that the decision of whether to routinely utilize an anaerobic blood culture bottle should be influenced by the overall recovery of bacteria and yeast, the recovery of specific types of bacteria or yeast, the medium type, and the blood culture system utilized by the laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12517851      PMCID: PMC149624          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.213-217.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Clinical value of anaerobic blood culture: a retrospective analysis of positive patient episodes.

Authors:  P A James; K M al-Shafi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Evaluation of routine anaerobic blood cultures in the BacT/Alert blood culture system.

Authors:  E R Bannister; G L Woods
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections.

Authors:  R Ziegler; I Johnscher; P Martus; D Lenhardt; H M Just
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Reassessment of the routine anaerobic culture and incubation time in the BacT/Alert FAN blood culture bottles.

Authors:  N Cornish; B A Kirkley; K A Easley; J A Washington
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Rationale for selective use of anaerobic blood cultures.

Authors:  A J Morris; M L Wilson; S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Critical assessment of blood culture techniques: analysis of recovery of obligate and facultative anaerobes, strict aerobic bacteria, and fungi in aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles.

Authors:  P R Murray; P Traynor; D Hopson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Reassessment of the incubation time in a controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert aerobic FAN bottle and standard anaerobic bottle used aerobically for the detection of bloodstream infections.

Authors:  N Cornish; B A Kirkley; K A Easley; J A Washington
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Clinical assessment of anaerobic isolates from blood cultures.

Authors:  S E Sharp; J C McLaughlin; J M Goodman; J Moore; S M Spanos; D W Keller; R J Poppiti
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  Clinical significance and outcome of anaerobic bacteremia.

Authors:  J H Salonen; E Eerola; O Meurman
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  M L Wilson; M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; L G Reimer; R J Feldman; C R Chuard; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessing how many blood cultures are needed for detecting bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Federico G Nicola
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Contribution of the BacT/Alert MB Mycobacterium bottle to bloodstream infection surveillance in Thailand: added yield for Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Possawat Jorakate; Melissa Higdon; Anek Kaewpan; Sirirat Makprasert; Somkhit Yuenprakhon; Kittisak Tawisaid; Surang Dejsirilert; Toni Whistler; Henry C Baggett
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Predominance of Enterobacteriaceae isolates in early positive anaerobic blood culture bottles in BacT/Alert system.

Authors:  Tzong-Shi Chiueh; Shih-Yi Lee; Sheng-Hui Tang; Jang-Jih Lu; Jun-Ren Sun
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Detection of bacterial and yeast species with the Bactec 9120 automated system with routine use of aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal media.

Authors:  Alfredo Chiarini; Angelo Palmeri; Teresa Amato; Rita Immordino; Salvatore Distefano; Anna Giammanco
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus in blood cultures by use of the direct tube coagulase test.

Authors:  Qinfang Qian; Karen Eichelberger; James E Kirby
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Utility of anaerobic bottles for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections.

Authors:  M Lafaurie; E d'Anglejan; J L Donay; D Glotz; E Sarfati; M Mimoun; M Legrand; E Oksenhendler; M Bagot; S Valade; B Bercot; J M Molina
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Microbial monitoring and methods of sample collection: a GITMO survey (Gruppo Trapianto di Midollo Osseo).

Authors:  Erica Gori; Emanuela Callea; Francesca Alberani; Laura Orlando
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2014-04-10

8.  Neonatal blood culture inoculant volume: feasibility and challenges.

Authors:  Emily C Woodford; Miren B Dhudasia; Karen M Puopolo; Lauren A Skerritt; Meera Bhavsar; Joanne DeLuca; Sagori Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.756

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.