Literature DB >> 11230415

Controlled clinical comparison of BACTEC plus anaerobic/F to standard anaerobic/F as the anaerobic companion bottle to plus aerobic/F medium for culturing blood from adults.

M L Wilson1, S Mirrett, F T Meredith, M P Weinstein, V Scotto, L B Reller.   

Abstract

To determine the optimal anaerobic companion bottle to pair with BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F medium for recovery of pathogenic microorganisms from adult patients with bacteremia and fungemia, we compared Plus Anaerobic/F bottles with Standard Anaerobic/F bottles, each of which was filled with 4 to 6 ml of blood. The two bottles were paired with a Plus Aerobic/F bottle filled with 8 to 12 ml of blood. A total of 14,011 blood culture sets were obtained. Of these, 11,583 sets were received with all three bottles filled adequately and 12,257 were received with both anaerobic bottles filled adequately. Of 818 clinically important isolates detected in one or both adequately filled anaerobic bottles, significantly more staphylococci (P < 0.001), streptococci (P < 0.005), Escherichia coli isolates (P < 0.02), Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (P < 0.005), and all microorganisms combined (P < 0.001) were detected in Plus Anaerobic/F bottles. In contrast, significantly more anaerobic gram-negative bacilli were detected in Standard Anaerobic/F bottles (P < 0.05). Of 397 unimicrobial episodes of septicemia, 354 were detected with both pairs, 30 were detected with Plus Aerobic/F-Plus Anaerobic/F pairs only, and 13 were detected with Plus Aerobic/F-Standard Anaerobic/F pairs only (P < 0.05). Significantly more episodes of bacteremia caused by members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P < 0.05) and aerobic and facultative gram-positive bacteria (P < 0.025) were detected with Plus Anaerobic/F bottles only. In a paired-bottle analysis, 810 of 950 isolates were recovered from both pairs, 90 were recovered from Plus Aerobic/F-Plus Anaerobic/F pairs only, and 50 were recovered from Plus Aerobic/F-Standard Anaerobic/F pairs only (P < 0.001). Paired Plus Aerobic/F-Plus Anaerobic/F bottles yielded significantly more staphylococci (P < 0.001), streptococci (P < 0.05), and members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P <0.001). We conclude that Plus Anaerobic/F bottles detect more microorganisms and episodes of bacteremia and fungemia than Standard Anaerobic/F bottles as companion bottles to Plus Aerobic/F bottles in the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11230415      PMCID: PMC87861          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.983-989.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  28 in total

1.  Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results.

Authors:  D W Bates; L Goldman; T H Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Multicenter clinical comparison of resin-containing bottles with standard aerobic and anaerobic bottles for culture of microorganisms from blood.

Authors:  H Lelièvre; M Gimenez; F Vandenesch; A Reinhardt; D Lenhardt; H M Just; M Pau; V Ausina; J Etienne
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; M L Wilson; L J Harrell; C W Stratton; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Reassessment of the routine anaerobic culture and incubation time in the BacT/Alert FAN blood culture bottles.

Authors:  N Cornish; B A Kirkley; K A Easley; J A Washington
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; M L Towns; S M Quartey; S Mirrett; L G Reimer; G Parmigiani; L B Reller
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Clinical comparison of BACTEC 9240 plus aerobic/F resin bottles and the isolator aerobic culture system for detection of bloodstream infections.

Authors:  F R Cockerill; G S Reed; J G Hughes; C A Torgerson; E A Vetter; W S Harmsen; J C Dale; G D Roberts; D M Ilstrup; N K Henry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Assessment of the yield of anaerobic blood cultures.

Authors:  S Pottumarthy; A J Morris
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.306

8.  Anaerobic bacteremia: decreasing rate over a 15-year period.

Authors:  C W Dorsher; J E Rosenblatt; W R Wilson; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug

9.  Anaerobic bacteremia: incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical significance.

Authors:  D P Lombardi; N C Engleberg
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Clinical significance and outcome of anaerobic bacteremia.

Authors:  J H Salonen; E Eerola; O Meurman
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the two blood culture systems, Bactec 9240 and BacT/Alert 3D, in the detection of Candida spp. and bacteria with polymicrobial sepsis.

Authors:  L Klingspor; S A Muhammed; V Ozenci
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress.

Authors:  Melvin P Weinstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Biographical feature: Melvin P. Weinstein, M.D.

Authors:  Betty A Forbes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  High medical impact of implementing the new polymeric bead-based BacT/ALERT® FAPlus and FNPlus blood culture bottles in standard care.

Authors:  R Amarsy-Guerle; F Mougari; H Jacquier; J Oliary; H Benmansour; J Riahi; B Berçot; L Raskine; E Cambau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/ALERT FN and the standard anaerobic SN blood culture medium.

Authors:  S Mirrett; C A Petti; C W Woods; R Magadia; M P Weinstein; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clinical evaluation of BacT/Alert FA plus and FN plus bottles compared with standard bottles.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Seong Chun Kim; In-Gyu Bae; Eun-Ha Koh; Sunjoo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art.

Authors:  Brigitte Lamy; Sylvie Dargère; Maiken C Arendrup; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Pierre Tattevin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.