Literature DB >> 8355271

Modulation of P(RM) activity by the lambda PR promoter in both the presence and absence of repressor.

R S Fong1, S Woody, G N Gussin.   

Abstract

When the transcription startsites of the phage lambda promoters PRM and PR are separated by 82 bp (the wild-type spacing), mutating PR increases the rate of open complex formation at PRM at all RNA polymerase (RNAP) concentrations tested in vitro. This is reflected in a fourfold increase in kappa f (the rate constant for isomerization of closed to open complexes) and a threefold decrease in KB (the equilibrium constant for formation of closed complexes). These effects of mutating PR resemble qualitatively those we observed when the separation between the two promoters was decreased by a single base-pair, but are quantitatively less dramatic. Although mutating PR has the additional effect of uncovering a weak promoter, P alpha, which overlaps both PRM and PR, the presence of P alpha does not account for the effects of PR mutations on open complex formation at PRM. In fixed-time assays at a single RNAP concentration, repressor stimulated PRM approximately threefold on a PR- template, indicating that activation is mediated substantially by a direct interaction between repressor and RNAP. That is, activation of PRM is not merely an indirect consequence of repressing PR. Kinetic data confirm this conclusion. In a PR- genetic background, repressor increased kappa f six- to eightfold and decreased KB approximately twofold. Similar results were obtained when OR3 was mutated, indicating that the effect on KB is not due to repressor binding to OR3. Thus, repressor causes a significant increase in the rate of open complex formation at PRM even when PR is inactive. On a PR+ template, 75 nM repressor stimulated PRM by increasing kappa f eightfold, with no effect on KB, which agrees with previous results. However, increased repressor concentrations stimulated kappa f by an additional factor of two to four, indicating that previous experiments underestimated the effect of repressor on kappa f. At the same time, increasing the repressor concentration decreased KB for PRM on a wild-type template. At the highest repressor concentration tested (275 nM), KB decreased 15-fold, presumably due to OR3-mediated repression of PRM. However, at an intermediate repressor concentration (170 nM) values of kappa f and KB for PRM on a PR+ template were in close agreement with the corresponding parameters obtained on a PR- template. These data lead us to suggest that repressor causes a decrease in KB for PRM on both a PR+ and a PR- template independent of its ability to bind to OR3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8355271     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  8 in total

1.  Mutually exclusive utilization of P(R) and P(RM) promoters in bacteriophage 434 O(R).

Authors:  J Xu; G B Koudelka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Promoter interference in a bacteriophage lambda control region: effects of a range of interpromoter distances.

Authors:  M G Strainic; J J Sullivan; J Collado-Vides; P L deHaseth
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Distortion in the spacer region of Pm during activation of middle transcription of phage Mu.

Authors:  I Artsimovitch; M Kahmeyer-Gabbe; M M Howe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Upstream interactions at the lambda pRM promoter are sequence nonspecific and activate the promoter to a lesser extent than an introduced UP element of an rRNA promoter.

Authors:  Y Tang; K Murakami; A Ishihama; P L deHaseth
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  New Insights into the Phage Genetic Switch: Effects of Bacteriophage Lambda Operator Mutations on DNA Looping and Regulation of PR, PL, and PRM.

Authors:  Dale E A Lewis; Gary N Gussin; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Sequence-dependent upstream DNA-RNA polymerase interactions in the open complex with lambdaPR and lambdaPRM promoters and implications for the mechanism of promoter interference.

Authors:  Laura Mangiarotti; Sara Cellai; Wilma Ross; Carlos Bustamante; Claudio Rivetti
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  DNA looping can enhance lysogenic CI transcription in phage lambda.

Authors:  L Meadow Anderson; Haw Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Elements in the λ immunity region regulate phage development: beyond the 'Genetic Switch'.

Authors:  Lynn C Thomason; Kathleen Morrill; Gillian Murray; Carolyn Court; Brenda Shafer; Thomas D Schneider; Donald L Court
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.979

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.