Literature DB >> 8351851

Detecting and discriminating the direction of motion of luminance and colour gratings.

A M Derrington1, G B Henning.   

Abstract

Human observers were required to discriminate the direction of motion of vertically moving, 1 c/deg luminance and colour gratings. The gratings had different contrasts and moved at temporal frequencies between 0.5 and 32 Hz. Sensitivity [the reciprocal of the contrast at which performance reached 75% correct in a temporal two-alternative forced-choice (2 AFC) discrimination task] was a band-pass function of temporal frequency for luminance gratings, and a low-pass function of temporal frequency for colour gratings. Further, when colour contrast was expressed in terms of the modulation in cone excitation produced by the stimulus, sensitivity to colour gratings was greater than sensitivity to luminance gratings at frequencies below 2 Hz. On the other hand, at temporal frequencies above 4 Hz, sensitivity to colour gratings was comparable with sensitivity to luminance gratings of double the temporal frequency. Detection sensitivity was measured for luminance and colour gratings of 1, 4 and 16 Hz. With either colour or luminance gratings, detection thresholds were very similar to those for direction-of-motion discrimination. This result confirms findings of Mullen and Boulton [(1992) Vision Research, 32, 483-488] and Cavanagh and Anstis [(1991) Vision Research, 31, 2109-2148], but is different from that reported by Lindsey and Teller [(1990) Vision Research, 30, 1751-1761] who used a smaller stimulus seen in a parafoveal region and found that motion discrimination thresholds were higher than detection threshold for colour gratings. We repeated our threshold measurements using parafoveal viewing conditions similar to those used by Lindsey and Teller (1990). We found that, although for luminance gratings detection thresholds were very close to direction-discrimination thresholds, for colour gratings, they were lower. The result is in qualitative agreement with Lindsey and Teller (1990). Our results suggest that low-level, or "first-order" motion mechanisms are not as sensitive to chromatic gratings as are colour-detection mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8351851     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90199-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  The mechanism of isoluminant chromatic motion perception.

Authors:  Z L Lu; L A Lesmes; G Sperling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stereoscopic and contrast-defined motion in human vision.

Authors:  A T Smith; N E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Contributions of human long-wave and middle-wave cones to motion detection.

Authors:  C F Stromeyer; R E Kronauer; A Ryu; A Chaparro; R T Eskew
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Interactions of flicker and motion.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Sion Gutentag; Christopher D Blair; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Diagnosis of colour vision deficits using eye movements.

Authors:  Aryaman Taore; Gabriel Lobo; Philip R Turnbull; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Separate colour-opponent mechanisms underlie the detection and discrimination of moving chromatic targets.

Authors:  A Willis; S J Anderson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  A common framework for the analysis of complex motion? Standstill and capture illusions.

Authors:  Max R Dürsteler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.