Literature DB >> 8351608

Conversions and complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of a survey conducted by the French Society of Endoscopic Surgery and Interventional Radiology.

D Collet1, M Edye, J Périssat.   

Abstract

During 1991, 41 surgeons of the French Society of Endoscopic Surgery and Operative Radiology (SFCERO) performed 3,673 cholecystectome of which 2,955 were laparoscopic. Data for those patients in whom a conversion to laparotomy was necessary or a complication occurred were collected by a retrospective multicenter survey. Conversion was performed in 142 patients (4.8%): in 106 this was due to pathology in the subhepatic space; in 36 it was because of a complication related to the laparoscopy. There were 101 postoperative complications (morbidity 3.4%): 59 biliary and 42 non biliary complications and six deaths (mortality 0.2%). There were 18 bile duct injuries, one of which led to the death of the patient. Excluding conversions to laparotomy, these figures are comparable to those for open cholecystectomy. These results define the limits and advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Conversion to laparotomy remains a wise option in cases of technical difficulty or doubtful biliary anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8351608     DOI: 10.1007/bf00725952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  [3606 cholecystectomies under celioscopy. The Register of the French Society of Digestive Surgery].

Authors:  B Suc; I Fontes Dislaire; G Fourtanier; J Escat
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1992

2.  Treatment of iatrogenic common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy through the laparoscopic insertion of a T-tube stent.

Authors:  G Lepsien; F E Lüdtke; T Neufang; A Schafmayer; H J Peiper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Interruption of professional and home activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among French and American patients.

Authors:  G C Vitale; D Collet; G M Larson; W G Cheadle; F B Miller; J Perissat
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Safe performance of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D Olsen; A Spaw; D Baird; H Asbun; M O'Reilly; K Fisher; W Saye
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Berci; J M Sackier
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Cholecystectomy: the gold standard.

Authors:  C K McSherry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  [Complications of cholecystectomy by laparoscopic approach. Apropos of 6512 cases].

Authors:  B Delaitre; P Testas; F Dubois; P Mouret; J M Nouaille; B Suc; D Collet
Journal:  Chirurgie       Date:  1992

9.  Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients.

Authors:  J H Peters; E C Ellison; J T Innes; J L Liss; K E Nichols; J M Lomano; S R Roby; M E Front; L C Carey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The improving results of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Pickleman; R P González
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-08
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Is male gender a risk factor for conversion of laparoscopic into open cholecystectomy?

Authors:  A Zisman; R Gold-Deutch; E Zisman; M Negri; Z Halpern; G Lin; A Halevy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S A Martin; J L Cameron; C J Yeo; M A Talamini; S Kaushal; J Coleman; A C Venbrux; S J Savader; F A Osterman; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Probability of adverse events that have not yet occurred: a statistical reminder.

Authors:  E Eypasch; R Lefering; C K Kum; H Troidl
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-02

5.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Iatrogenic bile duct injury--a cost analysis.

Authors:  Roland Andersson; Karin Eriksson; Per-Jonas Blind; Bobby Tingstedt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report on the community hospital experience in Hokkaido.

Authors:  N Kurauchi; N Kamii; K Kazui; Y Saji; J Uchino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.