Literature DB >> 8351184

The gap between rod and frame influences the rod-and-frame effect with small and large inducing displays.

P Zoccolotti1, G Antonucci, D Spinelli.   

Abstract

The role of the spatial separation between the ends of a rod and a frame's inner edge (gap) in modulating the rod-and-frame effect (RFE) has been studied here with frames subtending either large or small retinal angles. With a large frame, rod settings were always in the direction of frame tilt (direct effects) and varied inversely with gap size. With a small frame, rod settings were in the direction of frame tilt for tilts between 7.5 degrees and 15 degrees; with larger frame tilts, rod settings in the direction opposite that of the frame were observed (indirect effects). Increasing gap size produced a tendency toward negativity (away from frame tilt). Consequently, direct effects were larger for small gaps, while the opposite was true for indirect effects. Overall, these results point to the importance of gap size in modulating the RFE, for both large and small displays.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8351184     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  13 in total

1.  The role of frame size on vertical and horizontal observers in the rod-and-frame illusion.

Authors:  P Zoccolotti; G Antonucci; D R Goodenough; L Pizzamiglio; D Spinelli
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1992-03

2.  Spatial and orientation specific integration in the tilt illusion.

Authors:  S Johnstone; P Wenderoth
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Two-dimensional tilt illusions induced by orthogonal plaid patterns: effects of plaid motion, orientation, spatial separation, and spatial frequency.

Authors:  P Wenderoth; S Johnstone; R van der Zwan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  An orientation illusion analog to the rod and frame: relational effects in the magnitude of the distortion.

Authors:  S Coren; V S Hoy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-03

5.  Orientation contrast effects in the rod-and-frame test.

Authors:  D R Goodenough; P K Oltman; E Sigman; J Rosso; H Mertz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-05

6.  The distinction between the rod-and-frame illusion and the rod-and-frame test.

Authors:  P M Wenderoth
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Interactions between orientations in human vision.

Authors:  R H Carpenter; C Blakemore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1973-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Eye torsion in response to a tilted visual stimulus.

Authors:  D R Goodenough; E Sigman; P K Oltman; J Rosso; H Mertz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The roles of axes of symmetry in orientation illusions.

Authors:  A A Hartley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04

10.  Absence of relational determination in the rod-and-frame effect.

Authors:  S M Ebenholtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms enhances local processing in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Scott A Reed; Paul Dassonville
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Differential approach to strategies of segmental stabilisation in postural control.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Théophile Ohlmann; Jacques Crémieux; Bernard Amblard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Local and global visual mechanisms underlying individual differences in the rod-and-frame illusion.

Authors:  D Spinelli; G Antonucci; R Daini; P Zoccolotti
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

4.  Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine P Agathos; Delphine Bernardin; Delphine Huchet; Anne-Catherine Scherlen; Christine Assaiante; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-06-30

5.  Changes in rod and frame test scores recorded in schoolchildren during development--a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jeff Bagust; Sharon Docherty; Wayne Haynes; Richard Telford; Brice Isableu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Does the integration of haptic and visual cues reduce the effect of a biased visual reference frame on the subjective head orientation?

Authors:  Marc Gueguen; Nicolas Vuillerme; Brice Isableu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Two-Wrongs model explains perception-action dissociations for illusions driven by distortions of the egocentric reference frame.

Authors:  Paul Dassonville; Scott A Reed
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Processing of proprioceptive and vestibular body signals and self-transcendence in Ashtanga yoga practitioners.

Authors:  Francesca Fiori; Nicole David; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A Bayesian Account of Visual-Vestibular Interactions in the Rod-and-Frame Task.

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Anouk J de Brouwer; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-11-03

10.  Head Stability and Head-Trunk Coordination in Horseback Riders: The Contribution of Visual Information According to Expertise.

Authors:  Agnès Olivier; Elise Faugloire; Laure Lejeune; Sophie Biau; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.