Literature DB >> 4457823

The distinction between the rod-and-frame illusion and the rod-and-frame test.

P M Wenderoth.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1974        PMID： 4457823     DOI： 10.1068/p030205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN： 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Lack of evidence for a tactual Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  P Wenderoth; D Alais
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-09

2.  An orientation illusion analog to the rod and frame: relational effects in the magnitude of the distortion.

Authors:  S Coren; V S Hoy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-03

3.  Orientation contrast effects in the rod-and-frame test.

Authors:  D R Goodenough; P K Oltman; E Sigman; J Rosso; H Mertz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-05

4.  The gap between rod and frame influences the rod-and-frame effect with small and large inducing displays.

Authors:  P Zoccolotti; G Antonucci; D Spinelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-07

5.  Spatial context affects the Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  M J Spivey-Knowlton; B Bridgeman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-05

6.  Construct validity of perceptual style: role of stimulus size in the embedded-figures test and the rod-and-frame test.

Authors:  M J Streibel; S M Ebenholtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-02

7.  The roles of axes of symmetry in orientation illusions.

Authors:  A A Hartley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04

8.  Absence of depth processing in the large-frame rod-and-frame effect.

Authors:  S M Ebenholtz; G W Glaser
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-08

9.  Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality.

Authors:  Ksander N De Winkel; Ellen Edel; Riender Happee; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.677
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.