Literature DB >> 8349150

Evidence supporting the superiority of intraperitoneal cisplatin compared to intraperitoneal carboplatin for salvage therapy of small-volume residual ovarian cancer.

M Markman1, B Reichman, T Hakes, S Rubin, J L Lewis, W Jones, R Barakat, J Curtin, L Almadrones, W Hoskins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the relative efficacy of cisplatin-based intraperitoneal (IP) therapy versus carboplatin-based IP therapy as salvage treatment of small-volume residual ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined the surgically defined response rates of patients with ovarian cancer treated at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center on four organoplatinum-based salvage IP trials (cisplatin/etoposide, cisplatin/cytarabine, carboplatin/etoposide, carboplatin/etoposide + recombinant human erythropoietin). Additional criteria for inclusion in this analysis were: (a) small-volume residual disease (microscopic disease only or largest residual tumor mass < or = 0.5 cm) when IP therapy was initiated; (b) prior response to organoplatinum-based systemic therapy; (c) laparotomy evaluation for response to the IP salvage program.
RESULTS: The surgically documented complete response rate for patients with microscopic disease treated with cisplatin-based or carboplatin-based therapy was 46% (6/13) versus 38% (6/16), respectively (P > 0.25). In contrast, the surgically documented overall and complete response rates for patients with small-volume macroscopic disease treated with cisplatin or carboplatin were 71% (12/17) versus 32% (6/19) (P < 0.05, chi 2 test with Yates' correction), and 41% (6/17) versus 11% (2/19) (p < 0.1), respectively.
CONCLUSION: In agreement with experimental data demonstrating that the concentration of platinum within tumor is higher following equimolar doses of cisplatin, compared to carboplatin, we have observed, in this retrospective analysis, a higher surgically documented response rate for patients with small-volume residual macroscopic ovarian cancer receiving salvage cisplatin-based IP therapy. While a randomized trial will be required to definitively address the question of the relative effectiveness of the two commercially available organoplatinum agents for IP treatment of ovarian cancer, our data suggest that cisplatin is the superior agent for regional therapy in this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8349150     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

1.  A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intraperitoneal carboplatin and intravenous paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Mark A Morgan; Michael W Sill; Keiichi Fujiwara; Benjamin Greer; Stephen C Rubin; Koen Degeest; S Diane Yamada; Steven Waggoner; Robert L Coleman; Joan L Walker; Robert S Mannel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Csilla Hasovits; Stephen Clarke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pulmonary delivery of nanoparticle chemotherapy for the treatment of lung cancers: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Sharad Mangal; Wei Gao; Tonglei Li; Qi Tony Zhou
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 4.  Intraperitoneal drug delivery of antineoplastics.

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intravenous paclitaxel, intraperitoneal carboplatin and intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with untreated ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Natalie Gould; Michael W Sill; Robert S Mannel; P H Thaker; Paul Disilvestro; Steve Waggoner; S Diane Yamada; Deborah K Armstrong; Lari Wenzel; Helen Huang; Paula M Fracasso; Joan L Walker
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  Versatility of Particulate Carriers: Development of Pharmacodynamically Optimized Drug-Loaded Microparticles for Treatment of Peritoneal Cancer.

Authors:  Jessie L-S Au; Ze Lu; M Guillaume Wientjes
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 7.  Intraperitoneal therapy for peritoneal tumors: biophysics and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Wim P Ceelen; Michael F Flessner
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Tumor platinum concentration following intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin versus carboplatin in an ovarian cancer model.

Authors:  Danielle D Jandial; Karen Messer; Salman Farshchi-Heydari; Minya Pu; Stephen B Howell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Tumor-penetrating microparticles for intraperitoneal therapy of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ze Lu; Max Tsai; Dan Lu; Jie Wang; M Guillaume Wientjes; Jessie L-S Au
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess feasibility of intravenous docetaxel, intraperitoneal carboplatin and intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Natalie Gould; Michael W Sill; Robert S Mannel; Premal H Thaker; Paul A DiSilvestro; Steven E Waggoner; S Diane Yamada; Deborah K Armstrong; Paula M Fracasso; Joan L Walker
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.