OBJECTIVE: Current intraperitoneal (IP) regimens for the treatment of ovarian cancer rely on cisplatin (DDP) whereas intravenous regimens rely on carboplatin (CBDCA). A major question in the field is whether CBDCA can replace DDP for IP treatment. We compared the uptake of IP administered DDP and CBDCA into human ovarian carcinoma nodules of various sizes growing on the peritoneal surface of nu/nu mice. METHODS: Human 2008 cells expressing GFP were inoculated IP in nu/nu mice. When small tumor nodules became visible by external imaging, a maximum tolerated dose of DDP, or either an equimolar or equitoxic dose of CBDCA, was injected IP. Platinum (Pt) concentration in tumor nodules was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A total of 749 tumors harvested from 33 mice were analyzed for Pt concentration. DDP produced a 3.4-fold higher level of Pt in tumor nodules when compared to an equimolar dose of CBDCA (p=0.02). However, when DDP and CBDCA were injected at doses that were equitoxic to the mice, tumor Pt levels were equivalent (p=0.63). Although Pt concentrations of equal-sized nodules were highly variable, tumor Pt content (ng Pt/mg tumor) decreased with increasing nodule size following IP DDP, an effect not seen with IP administration of equitoxic doses of CBDCA (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that IP CBDCA has comparable or better drug penetration when compared to DDP given at equitoxic doses, and thus provide support for replacing DDP with CBDCA in the IP treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.
OBJECTIVE: Current intraperitoneal (IP) regimens for the treatment of ovarian cancer rely on cisplatin (DDP) whereas intravenous regimens rely on carboplatin (CBDCA). A major question in the field is whether CBDCA can replace DDP for IP treatment. We compared the uptake of IP administered DDP and CBDCA into humanovarian carcinoma nodules of various sizes growing on the peritoneal surface of nu/nu mice. METHODS:Human 2008 cells expressing GFP were inoculated IP in nu/nu mice. When small tumor nodules became visible by external imaging, a maximum tolerated dose of DDP, or either an equimolar or equitoxic dose of CBDCA, was injected IP. Platinum (Pt) concentration in tumor nodules was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A total of 749 tumors harvested from 33 mice were analyzed for Pt concentration. DDP produced a 3.4-fold higher level of Pt in tumor nodules when compared to an equimolar dose of CBDCA (p=0.02). However, when DDP and CBDCA were injected at doses that were equitoxic to the mice, tumorPt levels were equivalent (p=0.63). Although Pt concentrations of equal-sized nodules were highly variable, tumorPt content (ng Pt/mg tumor) decreased with increasing nodule size following IP DDP, an effect not seen with IP administration of equitoxic doses of CBDCA (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that IP CBDCA has comparable or better drug penetration when compared to DDP given at equitoxic doses, and thus provide support for replacing DDP with CBDCA in the IP treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.
Authors: Kuniyuki Katano; Roohangiz Safaei; Goli Samimi; Alison Holzer; Mika Tomioka; Murray Goodman; Stephen B Howell Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M A Bookman; W P McGuire; D Kilpatrick; E Keenan; W M Hogan; S W Johnson; P O'Dwyer; E Rowinsky; H H Gallion; R F Ozols Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Markman; B N Bundy; D S Alberts; J M Fowler; D L Clark-Pearson; L F Carson; S Wadler; J Sickel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laurie Elit; Thomas K Oliver; Allan Covens; Janice Kwon; Michael Fung-Kee Fung; Holger W Hirte; Amit M Oza Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: M Markman; B Reichman; T Hakes; S Rubin; J L Lewis; W Jones; R Barakat; J Curtin; L Almadrones; W Hoskins Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 1993-07 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Danielle A Jandial; William E Brady; Stephen B Howell; Heather A Lankes; Russell J Schilder; Jan H Beumer; Susan M Christner; Sandra Strychor; Matthew A Powell; Andrea R Hagemann; Kathleen N Moore; Joan L Walker; Paul A DiSilvestro; Linda R Duska; Paula M Fracasso; Don S Dizon Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Brooke E Sanders; Tomomi M Yamamoto; Alexandra McMellen; Elizabeth R Woodruff; Amber Berning; Miriam D Post; Benjamin G Bitler Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 6.009
Authors: Michelle M Boisen; Scott D Richard; Matthew P Holtzman; Robert P Edwards; Joseph L Kelley; Mohammad Haroon Choudry; David Bartlett; Marilyn Huang Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2016-02
Authors: Canan Schumann; Stephanie Chan; Jess A Millar; Yuliya Bortnyak; Katherine Carey; Alex Fedchyk; Leon Wong; Tetiana Korzun; Abraham S Moses; Anna Lorenz; Delany Shea; Olena Taratula; Oleh Khalimonchuk; Oleh Taratula Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2018-04-07 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Xian Chen; Kwang-Huei Low; Angela Alexander; Yufeng Jiang; Cansu Karakas; Kenneth R Hess; Jason P W Carey; Tuyen N Bui; Smruthi Vijayaraghavan; Kurt W Evans; Min Yi; D Christian Ellis; Kwok-Leung Cheung; Ian O Ellis; Siqing Fu; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Khandan Keyomarsi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Elisabeth K Petersen; Mats Bue; Christina Harlev; Andrea R Jørgensen; Anne Schmedes; Pelle Hanberg; Lone K Petersen; Maiken Stilling Journal: Pleura Peritoneum Date: 2022-06-06
Authors: Yi Wen Kong; Erik C Dreaden; Sandra Morandell; Wen Zhou; Sanjeev S Dhara; Ganapathy Sriram; Fred C Lam; Jesse C Patterson; Mohiuddin Quadir; Anh Dinh; Kevin E Shopsowitz; Shohreh Varmeh; Ömer H Yilmaz; Stephen J Lippard; H Christian Reinhardt; Michael T Hemann; Paula T Hammond; Michael B Yaffe Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 14.919