C H Knowles1, M Scott, P J Lunniss. 1. Academic Department of Surgery, St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Whitechapel, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the outcome data for colectomy performed for patients with slow transit constipation (STC). BACKGROUND: The outcome of surgical intervention in patients with STC is unpredictable. This may be a consequence of the lack of effectiveness of such interventions or may reflect heterogeneity within this group of patients. METHODS: The authors reviewed the data of all series in the English language that document the outcome of colectomy in > or = 10 patients in the treatment of STC. RESULTS: Thirty-two series fulfilled the entry criteria. There was widespread variability in patient satisfaction rates after colectomy (39% to 100%), reflecting large differences in the incidence of postoperative complications and in long-term functional results. Outcome was dependent on several clinical and pathophysiologic findings and on the type of study, the population studied, and the surgical procedure used. CONCLUSIONS: It may be possible to predict outcome on the basis of preoperative clinical and pathophysiologic findings. This review suggests a rationale for the selection of patients for colectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To review the outcome data for colectomy performed for patients with slow transit constipation (STC). BACKGROUND: The outcome of surgical intervention in patients with STC is unpredictable. This may be a consequence of the lack of effectiveness of such interventions or may reflect heterogeneity within this group of patients. METHODS: The authors reviewed the data of all series in the English language that document the outcome of colectomy in > or = 10 patients in the treatment of STC. RESULTS: Thirty-two series fulfilled the entry criteria. There was widespread variability in patient satisfaction rates after colectomy (39% to 100%), reflecting large differences in the incidence of postoperative complications and in long-term functional results. Outcome was dependent on several clinical and pathophysiologic findings and on the type of study, the population studied, and the surgical procedure used. CONCLUSIONS: It may be possible to predict outcome on the basis of preoperative clinical and pathophysiologic findings. This review suggests a rationale for the selection of patients for colectomy.
Authors: P Paré; Ronald Bridges; Malcolm C Champion; Subhas C Ganguli; James R Gray; E Jan Irvine; Victor Plourde; Pierre Poitras; Geoffrey K Turnbull; Paul Moayyedi; Nigel Flook; Stephen M Collins Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Alfonso Carriero; Jacopo Martellucci; Pasquale Talento; Carlo Andrea Ferrari Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: G L Lyford; C-L He; E Soffer; T L Hull; S A Strong; A J Senagore; L J Burgart; T Young-Fadok; J H Szurszewski; G Farrugia Journal: Gut Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 23.059