Literature DB >> 8348423

Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 2. Diagnosis of hypertension in adults.

R B Haynes1, Y Lacourcière, S W Rabkin, F H Leenen, A G Logan, N Wright, C E Evans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To update recommendations for the diagnosis of mild hypertension in adults and to assess the role of echocardiography, self-measurement of blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. DATA SOURCES: Literature reviews of previous consensus conferences were updated with searches of MEDLINE for the period Jan. 1, 1988, to Nov. 15, 1991, and supplemented by reference lists and personal files. STUDY SELECTION: Panel members selected relevant articles and rated them according to methodologic criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: The data extracted concerned the measurement of blood pressure, the diagnosis of hypertension, the treatment of mild hypertension, and the reliability and validity of echocardiography, self-measurement of blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of mild hypertension. The recommendations made were graded according to the level of evidence available, circulated to many experts and approved at a consensus conference. MAIN
RESULTS: Previous recommendations for the accurate measurement of blood pressure remain mostly unchanged. Antihypertensive treatment should be prescribed for patients (including the elderly) with an average diastolic blood pressure of at least 100 mm Hg, for those with isolated systolic hypertension (systolic blood pressure of at least 160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg) and for patients with a diastolic blood pressure of 90 to 99 mm Hg and target-organ damage. Clinical judgement is required in treating patients with a diastolic blood pressure of 90 to 99 mm Hg without target-organ damage, and individual risk for cardiovascular disease must be taken into account. There is insufficient evidence to warrant the routine use of echocardiography, self-measurement of blood pressure or ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Recent high-quality evidence supports several new recommendations for the diagnosis of mild hypertension in adults. Additional research is needed to determine the role of echocardiography, self-measurement of blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8348423      PMCID: PMC1485663     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  73 in total

1.  How common is white coat hypertension?

Authors:  T G Pickering; G D James; C Boddie; G A Harshfield; S Blank; J H Laragh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Validation of portable noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices: comparisons with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements.

Authors:  W F Graettinger; J L Lipson; D G Cheung; M A Weber
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension.

Authors:  G Parati; G Pomidossi; F Albini; D Malaspina; G Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  The reproducibility of average ambulatory, home, and clinic pressures.

Authors:  G D James; T G Pickering; L S Yee; G A Harshfield; S Riva; J H Laragh
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Hypertensive episodes and circadian fluctuations of blood pressure in patients with phaeochromocytoma: studies by long-term blood pressure monitoring based on a volume-oscillometric method.

Authors:  Y Imai; K Abe; Y Miura; M Nihei; S Sasaki; N Minami; M Munakata; N Taira; H Sekino; K Yamakoshi
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Effect of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on the diagnosis and cost of treatment for mild hypertension.

Authors:  L R Krakoff; H Eison; R H Phillips; S J Leiman; S Lev
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Changing relation between home and clinic blood-pressure measurements: do home measurements predict clinic hypertension?

Authors:  P L Padfield; B A Lindsay; J A McLaren; A Pirie; M Rademaker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-08-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Home blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy.

Authors:  C E Evans; R B Haynes; C H Goldsmith; S A Hewson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Comparison of office, home and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures in borderline and mild hypertension.

Authors:  G B Bialy; M C Ruddy; E S Malka; L A Silvay; N Kamalakannan
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Average daily blood pressure, not office blood pressure, determines cardiac function in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  W B White; P Schulman; E J McCabe; H M Dey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  17 in total

1.  Contemporary practice patterns in the management of newly diagnosed hypertension.

Authors:  F A McAlister; K K Teo; R Z Lewanczuk; G Wells; T J Montague
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  [Hypertension. A new way to approach an old problem].

Authors:  M Aubin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Clinical problem solving based on the 1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension.

Authors:  R D Feldman; N R Campbell; P Larochelle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension. Task Force for the Development of the 1999 Canadian Recommendations for the Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  R D Feldman; N Campbell; P Larochelle; P Bolli; E D Burgess; S G Carruthers; J S Floras; R B Haynes; G Honos; F H Leenen; L A Leiter; A G Logan; M G Myers; J D Spence; K B Zarnke
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Evaluation of a community-based automated blood pressure measuring device.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Lewis; Eleanor Boyle; Lucy Magharious; Martin G Myers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Impact of treating hyperlipidemia or hypertension to reduce the risk of death from coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S Perreault; M Dorais; L Coupal; G Paradis; M R Joffres; S A Grover
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-05-18       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Evidence-based care: 2. Setting guidelines: how should we manage this problem?

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 5. Hypertension and diabetes.

Authors:  K G Dawson; J K McKenzie; S A Ross; J L Chiasson; P Hamet
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 3. Pharmacologic treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  R I Ogilvie; E D Burgess; J R Cusson; R D Feldman; L A Leiter; M G Myers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Echocardiography for primary care evaluation of hypertension.

Authors:  R Nahas; R Freeman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.