Literature DB >> 3421509

Comparison of office, home and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures in borderline and mild hypertension.

G B Bialy1, M C Ruddy, E S Malka, L A Silvay, N Kamalakannan.   

Abstract

Clinic/office (casual), home (self), and twenty-four-hour ambulatory (ABP) blood pressure determinations were compared in 32 subjects defined by conventional office criteria as mild or borderline hypertensives. Office diastolic blood pressures (mean 93.1 +/- 5.3 mmHg) were significantly higher than either home (mean 88.9 +/- 7.1 mm Hg) or awake ABP (mean 88.4 +/- 8.4 mm Hg) readings for the total group, as well as for the mild hypertension subgroup (office mean 96.0 +/- 3.5 mm Hg, home mean 91.0 +/- 8.0, awake ABP mean 90.4 +/- 8.8) but not for the borderline subgroup. In the total study group, office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) correlated better with home DBP (r = 0.58, p = 0.0005), than with the awake ABP (r = 0.40, p = 0.02). Home DBP correlated well with awake DBP (r = 0.48, p = 0.006). In subgroup analysis, office DBPs correlated well with home (self) readings for both the mild (r = 0.53, p = 0.03) and the borderline (r = 0.62, p = 0.01) subgroups. When office DBPs were compared with awake ABP DBPs, the correlation coefficient for the mild subgroup was significant (r = 0.49, p = 0.04); this was not the case for the borderline subgroup (r = 0.10, p = NS). Comparison of home (self) DBPs with awake ABP determinations revealed a good correlation for the borderline subgroup (r = 0.63, p = 0.01) but not for the mild subgroup (r = 0.35, p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3421509     DOI: 10.1177/000331978803900808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angiology        ISSN: 0003-3197            Impact factor:   3.619


  3 in total

Review 1.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 2. Diagnosis of hypertension in adults.

Authors:  R B Haynes; Y Lacourcière; S W Rabkin; F H Leenen; A G Logan; N Wright; C E Evans
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Home blood pressure monitoring for mild hypertensives.

Authors:  L T Midanik; B Resnick; L B Hurley; E J Smith; M McCarthy
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Psychological characteristics and responses to antihypertensive drug therapy.

Authors:  Samuel J Mann; Linda M Gerber
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.