Literature DB >> 8347845

Predicting recurrence in axillary-node negative breast cancer patients.

D Rosner1, W W Lane.   

Abstract

This study attempted to identify the risk groups in axillary node negative breast cancer patients using validated first-generation prognostic clinical and pathologic factors. An updated 10-year follow-up in 407 such patients treated by surgery alone at Roswell Park between 1976-1987 showed a 10-year recurrence rate (RR) of 19% (95% confidence interval +/- 5%). Predictors of outcome were, in order of strength: (1) Tumor size (p = 0.0006); RR at 10 years was 2% +/- 4 for tumors < or = 0.5 cm, 6% +/- 7 for tumors 0.6-1.0 cm, 16% +/- 9 for 1.1-2 cm, 29% +/- 12 for 2.1-5 cm, and 40% +/- 31 over 5 cm; (2) Histologic differentiation (p = 0.017); poorly differentiated/anaplastic (P/A) tumors had a greater RR (24% +/- 8) than well or moderately differentiated (W/M) tumors (13% +/- 8); (3) Age (p = 0.046); patients < 35 showed a RR of 28% +/- 20, pts 35-50, 22% +/- 10, and pts > 50,17% +/- 7 (p = 0.046). Cox Model analysis showed tumor size (4 groups) significant at < 0.0001, histologic differentiation (2 groups) significant at < 0.0005 after allowing for size, and age (+/- 50) significant at < 0.05 after allowing for size and differentiation. Combining these variables into subgroups enables selecting groups at various risks of recurrence. Groups with low risk are: (1) patients with tumor < or = 1 cm, W/M (0% RR), (2) patients with ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (0% RR), and (3) patients with tumors < or = 1 cm, P/A (8% RR). In a suggestive finding in this last group, those over age 50 achieved a RR of 3% +/- 6, while those age 50 or less had RR 14% +/- 15. With the exception of this last group, all should be considered highly curable using loco-regional therapy alone, and might be spared the risks and costs of routine systemic adjuvant therapy. Groups with high risk are: (1) patients with tumors > 2 cm (RR 32% +/- 12), and (2) patients with tumors 1.1-2 cm, P/A (RR 21% +/- 14). These should receive adjuvant therapy. Groups with intermediate risk are patients with tumor 1.1-2 cm, W/M (RR 12% +/- 12). In a suggestive finding, those in this group over age 50 had a RR of 11% +/- 12, while those up to 50 had a RR of 17% +/- 30. These patients should be considered to be prime candidates for clinical trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8347845     DOI: 10.1007/bf00662138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  55 in total

1.  A long-term follow-up study of survival in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma.

Authors:  P R Rosen; S Groshen; P E Saigo; D W Kinne; S Hellman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Cathepsin D: an independent prognostic factor for metastasis of breast cancer.

Authors:  F Spyratos; T Maudelonde; J P Brouillet; M Brunet; A Defrenne; C Andrieu; K Hacene; A Desplaces; J Rouëssé; H Rochefort
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-11-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1,010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy.

Authors:  G Contesso; H Mouriesse; S Friedman; J Genin; D Sarrazin; J Rouesse
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Psychiatric morbidity and physical toxicity associated with adjuvant chemotherapy after mastectomy.

Authors:  G P Maguire; A Tait; M Brooke; C Thomas; J M Howat; R A Sellwood; H Bush
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-01

6.  Node-negative minimal invasive breast cancer patients are not candidates for routine systemic adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  D Rosner; W W Lane
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer. A decision-analysis model.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Leukemia following chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  R E Curtis; J D Boice; W C Moloney; L G Ries; J T Flannery
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Physical and psychologic distress associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  M T Knobf
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project: prognostic significance of erbB-2 protein overexpression in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  S Paik; R Hazan; E R Fisher; R E Sass; B Fisher; C Redmond; J Schlessinger; M E Lippman; C R King
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  8 in total

1.  What influences diagnostic delay in low-income women with breast cancer?

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Barbara Leake; Cynthia M Mojica; Yihang Liu; Allison L Diamant; Amardeep Thind
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Ethnicity and birthplace in relation to tumor size and stage in Asian American women with breast cancer.

Authors:  A N Hedeen; E White; V Taylor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Breast cancer size and stage in Hispanic American women, by birthplace: 1992-1995.

Authors:  A N Hedeen; E White
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Tumour size and vascular invasion predict distant metastasis in stage I breast cancer. Grade distinguishes early and late metastasis.

Authors:  P J Westenend; C J C Meurs; R A M Damhuis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Investigation of promoter methylation patterns association with genes expression profile of ISL1, MGMT and DMNT3b in tissue of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hadi Yari; Samira Shabani; Nahid Nafissi; Tayebeh Majidzadeh; Frouzandeh Mahjoubi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Breast cancer recurrence: follow up after treatment for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  N Hiramanek
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Simultaneous copy number gains of NUPR1 and ERBB2 predicting poor prognosis in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Seung-Hyun Jung; Ahwon Lee; Seon-Hee Yim; Hae-Jin Hu; Chungyoul Choe; Yeun-Jun Chung
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Characteristics and Outcomes for Secondary Breast Cancer in Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors Treated with Radiation.

Authors:  Candice A M Sauder; Qian Li; Alisha Othieno; Daisy Cruz; Mili Arora; Richard J Bold; Fredrick J Meyers; Theresa H M Keegan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.090

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.