Literature DB >> 8347843

Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening: preliminary results of a systematic review of the literature.

M L Brown1, L Fintor.   

Abstract

There is now considerable concern that universal access to health care within realistic resource constraints requires some sort of cost-effectiveness analysis of given medical procedures and interventions. One such intervention is routine mammographic screening for breast cancer. Here, we report preliminary results from an ongoing project to conduct a systematic and comprehensive review and comparison of the published cost-effectiveness analyses of screening for the early detection of breast cancer. We examine 16 such studies, and compare two studies in detail to explain how differences in assumptions and in consideration of down-stream effects have caused the published results for apparently comparable breast cancer screening programs to span a broad range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8347843     DOI: 10.1007/bf00662136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  14 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of breast cancer.

Authors:  J J Zavertnik; C B McCoy; D S Robinson; N Love
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  P J van der Maas; H J de Koning; B M van Ineveld; G J van Oortmarssen; J D Habbema; K T Lubbe; A T Geerts; H J Collette; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 3.  A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A S Detsky; I G Naglie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Costs of screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  M Moskowitz
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study.

Authors:  K Gerard; G Salkeld; J Hall
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1990-05-07       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 6.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit.

Authors:  L Tabar; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy; N E Day
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of mass screening for breast cancer in Japan.

Authors:  I Okubo; H Glick; H Frumkin; J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The mathematics of screening mammography.

Authors:  R A Forsyth
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.538

10.  Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors.

Authors:  H J de Koning; B M van Ineveld; G J van Oortmarssen; J C de Haes; H J Collette; J H Hendriks; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1991-10-21       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  18 in total

1.  Screening for colon cancer.

Authors:  J P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

2.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with Type 2 diabetes and additional atherogenic risk factors.

Authors:  Yasuaki Hayashino; Sizuko Nagata-Kobayashi; Takeshi Morimoto; Kenji Maeda; Takuro Shimbo; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Natasha K Stout; Dennis G Fryback; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Benjamin A Herman; Lucy G Hannah; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  The costs and effects of cervical and breast cancer screening in a public hospital emergency room. The Cancer Control Center of Harlem.

Authors:  J Mandelblatt; H Freeman; D Winczewski; K Cagney; S Williams; R Trowers; J Tang; K Gold; T H Lin; J Kerner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Analysis of economic evaluations of pharmacological cancer treatments in Spain between 1990 and 2010.

Authors:  Angel Sanz-Granda; Alvaro Hidalgo; Juan E del Llano; Joan Rovira
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Finding cancer in primary care outpatients with low back pain: a comparison of diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  J D Joines; R A McNutt; T S Carey; R A Deyo; R Rouhani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening.

Authors:  S E Stockdale; E Keeler; N Duan; K P Derose; S A Fox
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  A breast cancer care report card. An assessment of performance and a pursuit of value.

Authors:  J G West; M L Sutherland; J S Link; D A Margileth
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-04

9.  Prevention, screening and treatment of colorectal cancer: a global and regional generalized cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gary M Ginsberg; Stephen S Lim; Jeremy A Lauer; Benjamin P Johns; Cecilia R Sepulveda
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2010-03-17

10.  Cost effectiveness of shortening screening interval or extending age range of NHS breast screening programme: computer simulation study.

Authors:  R Boer; H de Koning; A Threlfall; P Warmerdam; A Street; E Friedman; C Woodman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.