Literature DB >> 8347385

Elderly people's views of an annual screening assessment.

I B McIntosh1, K G Power.   

Abstract

A survey was carried out in order to identify elderly patients' perceptions of their health status, their health worries and their opinions regarding health screening before and after the introduction of an annual screening programme. Pre- and post-assessment self report, structured questionnaires and standardized, objectively scored, functional and medical assessments were used. The cohort was an age and sex stratified, 20% sample of those aged 75 years and over (133 patients). Results showed that 96% of patients before the assessment and 98% of patients afterwards, considered the annual assessment useful. The domiciliary visit by the health visitors resulted in one third of those patients who perceived themselves to be in good health and three quarters of those who perceived themselves to be in poor health becoming less worried about their health. Only two patients became more worried. Half of those objectively assessed as being in the medium health risk group and 68% of those in the high health risk group became less worried about their health after screening. Despite the majority of patients having welcomed the assessment their visit resulted in false, and potentially harmful, reassurance for a considerable number of individuals objectively assessed as being at medium and high health risk. An adverse consequence of health screening in elderly people may be inappropriate reassurance for those objectively assessed to be at risk. However, screening procedures are a means to an end, not an end in themselves. The identification of those at high risk should see subsequent implementation of services, investigations and increased support to relieve suffering, so it may have been that patients felt less anxious because they were anticipating relief of their problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8347385      PMCID: PMC1372390     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  19 in total

1.  A COMPARISON OF SELF AND PHYSICIANS' HEALTH RATINGS IN AN OLDER POPULATION.

Authors:  H J FRIEDSAM; H W MARTIN
Journal:  J Health Hum Behav       Date:  1963

2.  SELF-ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH STATUS: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SELECTED ELDERLY SUBJECTS.

Authors:  G L MADDOX
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1964-05

Review 3.  Screening elderly people: a review of the literature in the light of the new general practitioner contract.

Authors:  E R Perkins
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Some correlates of differences in self-assessment of health status among the elderly.

Authors:  G L MADDOX
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1962-04

5.  Clinical biostatistics. XLI. Hard science, soft data, and the challenges of choosing clinical variables in research.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  Psychological costs of screening.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-26

7.  Comparison of self and health professionals' ratings of the health of community-based elderly.

Authors:  C C Wilson; F E Netting
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  1987

8.  Consequences of assessment and intervention among elderly people: a three year randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C Hendriksen; E Lund; E Strømgård
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-01

9.  Can health screening damage your health?

Authors:  H G Stoate
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

10.  General practice geriatric surveillance scheme.

Authors:  I B McIntosh; M Young; T Stewart
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 0.729

View more
  2 in total

1.  Preventive home visits to elderly people in the community. Visits are most useful for people aged >/= 75.

Authors:  J Newbury; J Marley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000 Aug 19-26

2.  Annual assessments of patients aged 75 years and over: views and experiences of elderly people.

Authors:  C A Chew; D Wilkin; C Glendinning
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.386

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.