Literature DB >> 7748667

Annual assessments of patients aged 75 years and over: views and experiences of elderly people.

C A Chew1, D Wilkin, C Glendinning.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 1990 contract requires general practitioners to offer all their patients aged 75 years and over an annual health check. Increasing importance is being placed on consumers' views of service provision. AIM: A study was undertaken in June 1992 to investigate elderly patients' views and experiences of the annual health check, and to compare these with the previously reported views of general practitioners and practice nurses who had also been surveyed as part of the study.
METHOD: Twenty family health services authorities wrote to a sample of 1500 elderly patients asking if the patient's name could be passed to researchers. Patients who agreed were then interviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 664 elderly patients (44%) were interviewed. Only 64% of respondents were aware of their entitlement to a health check. Vulnerable patients, such as those in poor health or who lived alone, were less likely to know about the health checks than other patients. Only 31% of respondents thought they had had a health check. Of these, fewer than half recalled the doctor or nurse discussing the findings with them, although 80% of doctors reported that they always or mostly discussed results with patients. Elderly patients were more likely to recall the physical aspects of the health check rather than discussion about particular health aspects. However, doctors and nurses felt that routine checks were useful for giving advice rather than detecting medical problems. Of those who had had a health check, 82% reported no improvement in their health as a result, but 93% thought that they were a good idea. Only 7% of doctors thought they were of value, compared with the majority of nurses.
CONCLUSION: It appeared that the inverse care law was operating, with those more in need of the service being less likely to have known about it. Discrepancies were found between general practitioners' and practice nurses' reports of service provision and those of elderly patients. Evidence about the cost-effectiveness of regular health checks may help the conflict between professional scepticism and consumer enthusiasm for these assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7748667      PMCID: PMC1239080     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  13 in total

1.  Screening elderly people in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R T McEwan; N Davison; D P Forster; P Pearson; E Stirling
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Screening elderly people: a review of the literature in the light of the new general practitioner contract.

Authors:  E R Perkins
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  The inverse care law.

Authors:  J T Hart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A randomized controlled trial of geriatric screening and surveillance in general practice.

Authors:  A J Tulloch; V Moore
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1979-12

5.  Consequences of assessment and intervention among elderly people: a three year randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C Hendriksen; E Lund; E Strømgård
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-01

6.  The effects of a system of geriatric screening and assessment on general practice workload.

Authors:  J H Barber; J B Wallis
Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)       Date:  1982-05

7.  Geriatric screening: a reappraisal of preventive strategies in the care of the elderly.

Authors:  C B Freer
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-06

8.  Assessment of elderly people in general practice. 2. Functional abilities and medical problems.

Authors:  S Iliffe; A Haines; S Gallivan; A Booroff; E Goldenberg; P Morgan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Assessment of patients aged over 75 in general practice.

Authors:  J Tremellen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-12

10.  Health checks on patients 75 years and over in Nottinghamshire after the new GP contract.

Authors:  K Brown; E I Williams; L Groom
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Who cares in England and Wales? The Positive Care Law: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mary Shaw; Danny Dorling
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Identifying unmet health needs in older people: comprehensive screening is not the answer.

Authors:  Steve Iliffe; Martin Orrell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Introduction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  2002-02

Review 4.  Evidence-based medicine and general practice.

Authors:  L D Jacobson; A G Edwards; S K Granier; C C Butler
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Improving uptake of influenza vaccination among older people: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Antony J Arthur; Ruth J Matthews; Carol Jagger; Michael Clarke; Alison Hipkin; Dean P Bennison
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.