Literature DB >> 8345771

Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency.

J Kalinowski1, J Armson, M Roland-Mieszkowski, A Stuart, V L Gracco.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of altered auditory feedback on stuttering frequency during speech production at two different speech rates, Nine stutterers, who exhibited at least 5% dysfluency during a reading task, served as subjects. They read eight different passages (each 300 syllables in length) while receiving four conditions of auditory feedback: nonaltered, masking, delayed, and frequency altered. For each auditory feedback condition, subjects read at both a normal and a fast rate. Results indicated that stuttering frequency was significantly decreased during conditions of delayed and frequency altered auditory feedback at both speech rates (p < 0.05). These findings refute the notion that a slowed speech rate is necessary for fluency enhancement under conditions of altered auditory feedback. Considering previous research and the results of this study, it is proposed that there may be two interdependent factors that are responsible for fluency enhancement: alteration of auditory feedback and modification of speech production.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8345771     DOI: 10.1177/002383099303600101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  32 in total

1.  Speech disruption during delayed auditory feedback with simultaneous visual feedback.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; Danielle Striemer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: evidence from mental imagery and MEG.

Authors:  Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Speaker compensation for local perturbation of fricative acoustic feedback.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of voice harmonic complexity on ERP responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Oleg Korzyukov; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Emily O Garnett; Andrew Etchell; Ho Ming Chow
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 7.519

6.  Adults who stutter and metronome synchronization: evidence for a nonspeech timing deficit.

Authors:  Anastasia G Sares; Mickael L D Deroche; Douglas M Shiller; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  A Mutation Associated with Stuttering Alters Mouse Pup Ultrasonic Vocalizations.

Authors:  Terra D Barnes; David F Wozniak; Joanne Gutierrez; Tae-Un Han; Dennis Drayna; Timothy E Holy
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production.

Authors:  Oren Civier; Stephen M Tasko; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.538

9.  Impaired timing adjustments in response to time-varying auditory perturbation during connected speech production in persons who stutter.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Deryk S Beal; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Non-linguistic auditory processing in stuttering: evidence from behavior and event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Amanda Hampton; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.