Literature DB >> 24486601

Impaired timing adjustments in response to time-varying auditory perturbation during connected speech production in persons who stutter.

Shanqing Cai1, Deryk S Beal2, Satrajit S Ghosh3, Frank H Guenther4, Joseph S Perkell5.   

Abstract

Auditory feedback (AF), the speech signal received by a speaker's own auditory system, contributes to the online control of speech movements. Recent studies based on AF perturbation provided evidence for abnormalities in the integration of auditory error with ongoing articulation and phonation in persons who stutter (PWS), but stopped short of examining connected speech. This is a crucial limitation considering the importance of sequencing and timing in stuttering. In the current study, we imposed time-varying perturbations on AF while PWS and fluent participants uttered a multisyllabic sentence. Two distinct types of perturbations were used to separately probe the control of the spatial and temporal parameters of articulation. While PWS exhibited only subtle anomalies in the AF-based spatial control, their AF-based fine-tuning of articulatory timing was substantially weaker than normal, especially in early parts of the responses, indicating slowness in the auditory-motor integration for temporal control.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory feedback; Sensorimotor integration; Speech production; Speech timing; Stuttering

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24486601      PMCID: PMC3947674          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  16 in total

1.  Focal manipulations of formant trajectories reveal a role of auditory feedback in the online control of both within-syllable and between-syllable speech timing.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Audiovocal integration in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Torrey Loucks; HeeCheong Chon; Woojae Han
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Auditory evoked fields to vocalization during passive listening and active generation in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Deryk S Beal; Douglas O Cheyne; Vincent L Gracco; Maher A Quraan; Margot J Taylor; Luc F De Nil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production.

Authors:  Frank H Guenther; Satrajit S Ghosh; Jason A Tourville
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Speech-induced suppression of evoked auditory fields in children who stutter.

Authors:  Deryk S Beal; Maher A Quraan; Douglas O Cheyne; Margot J Taylor; Vincent L Gracco; Luc F De Nil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech.

Authors:  Stephanie H Chen; Hanjun Liu; Yi Xu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The role of large-scale neural interactions for developmental stuttering.

Authors:  C Lu; N Ning; D Peng; G Ding; K Li; Y Yang; C Lin
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Weak responses to auditory feedback perturbation during articulation in persons who stutter: evidence for abnormal auditory-motor transformation.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Deryk S Beal; Satrajit S Ghosh; Mark K Tiede; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.

Authors:  Ja Young Choi; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

2.  Auditory prediction during speaking and listening.

Authors:  Marc Sato; Douglas M Shiller
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Motor practice effects and sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: Evidence from visuomotor tracking performance.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Shawn S Goodman; Richard M Arenas
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  Anomalous morphology in left hemisphere motor and premotor cortex of children who stutter.

Authors:  Emily O Garnett; Ho Ming Chow; Alfonso Nieto-Castañón; Jason A Tourville; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Emily O Garnett; Andrew Etchell; Ho Ming Chow
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 7.519

6.  Dissociations among linguistic, cognitive, and auditory-motor neuroanatomical domains in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ai Leen Choo; Evamarie Burnham; Kristin Hicks; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Stuttering adults' lack of pre-speech auditory modulation normalizes when speaking with delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth A Wieland; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

9.  Auditory Masking Effects on Speech Fluency in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia: Comparison to Altered Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Sara-Ching Chao; Lacee C Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.