Literature DB >> 8340282

Human auditory cortical mechanisms of sound lateralization: I. Interaural time differences within sound.

M Sams1, M Hämäläinen, R Hari, L McEvoy.   

Abstract

Neuromagnetic responses to 600-ms binaural click trains, presented once every 1.1 s, were recorded with a 24-channel gradiometer from 6 healthy humans. During the first 300 ms, the left-ear stimulus led the right by 0.7 ms and the sound was lateralized to the left ear. At 300 ms, the interaural time difference (ITD) changed and the lateralization moved to one of 5 different locations between the ears. An N100m response peaked about 110 ms after the sound onset and an N130mc response (c to stress a response to the change) about 135 ms after the ITD change. The source locations of N100m and N130mc agreed with activity in the supratemporal auditory cortex; this was confirmed in one subject by superimposing MEG results on MR images. The sources of N100m and N130mc did not differ statistically significantly from each other, nor were there differences in N130mc sources to various lateralization changes. N130mc grew larger when the ITD change increased, in parallel with the increase in the change of the perceived location. We suggest that N130mc is analogous to N100m, but is delayed due to postmasking induced by the early part of the sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8340282     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90236-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Right-hemisphere dominance for the processing of sound-source lateralization.

Authors:  J Kaiser; W Lutzenberger; H Preissl; H Ackermann; N Birbaumer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Auditory evoked fields to illusory sound source movements.

Authors:  J P Mäkelä; L McEvoy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The analysis of simple and complex auditory signals in human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic evidence from M100 modulation.

Authors:  Julian Jenkins; William J Idsardi; David Poeppel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Habituation of visual evoked responses in neonates and fetuses: a MEG study.

Authors:  Tamara Matuz; Rathinaswamy B Govindan; Hubert Preissl; Eric R Siegel; Jana Muenssinger; Pamela Murphy; Maureen Ware; Curtis L Lowery; Hari Eswaran
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.464

6.  Event-related potentials to single-cycle binaural beats of a pure tone, a click train, and a noise.

Authors:  Pekcan Ungan; Suha Yagcioglu; Ece Ayik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual-induced expectations modulate auditory cortical responses.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Lukasz Grzeczkowski
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Emphasis of spatial cues in the temporal fine structure during the rising segments of amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  Mathias Dietz; Torsten Marquardt; Nelli H Salminen; David McAlpine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Asymmetric lateral inhibitory neural activity in the auditory system: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Hidehiko Okamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi; Atsuko Gunji; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Assessment of haptic memory using somatosensory change-related cortical responses.

Authors:  Shunsuke Sugiyama; Tomoaki Kinukawa; Nobuyuki Takeuchi; Makoto Nishihara; Toshiki Shioiri; Koji Inui
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.