Literature DB >> 8335040

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and models in clinical trials.

J L Steimer1, M E Ebelin, J Van Bree.   

Abstract

There is current emphasis for extended integration of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) into all phases of new drug development, including large-scale clinical trials. In this paper, we focus on study design and data analysis issues for the investigation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and blood level/effect relationships in patients. The application of descriptive and model-based regression statistical methodology for including sparse drug systemic concentration data in the analysis of efficacy and safety is illustrated by examples chosen from diverse therapeutic areas. The population approach, based on mixed-effects modelling, is one such methodology, which also provides new tools for analysis of response vs dose and response vs time data. The existence of a variety of statistical techniques for handling complex PK/PD time-varying data should increase the impact of such data analysis on future drug development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8335040     DOI: 10.1007/BF03220009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  47 in total

1.  Neural networks in pharmacodynamic modeling. Is current modeling practice of complex kinetic systems at a dead end?

Authors:  P Veng-Pedersen; N B Modi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-08

2.  Prediction of acute graft rejection in renal transplantation: the utility of cyclosporine blood concentrations.

Authors:  J Grevel; K L Napoli; M S Welsh; N E Atkinson; B D Kahan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Semiparametric approach to pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data.

Authors:  D Verotta; S L Beal; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1989-04

4.  Procainamide dosage schedules, plasma concentrations, and clinical effects.

Authors:  J Koch-Weser; S W Klein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1971-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Pharmacodynamics in cancer therapy.

Authors:  M J Ratain; R L Schilsky; B A Conley; M J Egorin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prediction of diltiazem plasma concentration curves from limited measurements using compliance data.

Authors:  A Rubio; C Cox; M Weintraub
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  A simulation study comparing designs for dose ranging.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; Y Hashimoto; S L Beal
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Self-inhibiting action of nortriptylin's antidepressive effect at high plasma levels: a randomized double-blind study controlled by plasma concentrations in patients with endogenous depression.

Authors:  P Kragh-Sorensen; C E Hansen; P C Baastrup; E F Hvidberg
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1976-02-02

9.  Population dose versus response of betaxolol and atenolol: a comparison of potency and variability.

Authors:  N C Sambol; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Cyclosporine monitoring in renal transplantation: area under the curve monitoring is superior to trough-level monitoring.

Authors:  J Grevel; M S Welsh; B D Kahan
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.681

View more
  11 in total

1.  Optimal sampling times for Bayesian estimation of the pharmacokinetic parameters of nortriptyline during therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Y Merlé; F Mentré
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1999-02

Review 2.  The influence of cardiovascular physiology on dose/pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.

Authors:  Pietro Fagiolino; Rosa Eiraldi; Marta Vázquez
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Overview of model-building strategies in population PK/PD analyses: 2002-2004 literature survey.

Authors:  C Dartois; K Brendel; E Comets; C M Laffont; C Laveille; B Tranchand; F Mentré; A Lemenuel-Diot; P Girard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacology = disease progression + drug action.

Authors:  Nick Holford
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Methodological issues in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling.

Authors:  E Bellissant; V Sébille; G Paintaud
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Validation of a decision support system for use in drug development: pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  S Guzy; C A Hunt
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Bayesian design criteria: computation, comparison, and application to a pharmacokinetic and a pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Y Merlé; F Mentré
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1995-02

Review 8.  Role of population pharmacokinetics in drug development. A pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  E Samara; R Granneman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Using plasma topotecan pharmacokinetics to estimate topotecan exposure in cerebrospinal fluid of children with medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Burgess B Freeman; Lisa C Iacono; John C Panetta; Amar Gajjar; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of newly developed dexibuprofen sustained release formulations.

Authors:  Selvadurai Muralidharan
Journal:  ISRN Pharm       Date:  2012-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.