Literature DB >> 2023881

Prediction of acute graft rejection in renal transplantation: the utility of cyclosporine blood concentrations.

J Grevel1, K L Napoli, M S Welsh, N E Atkinson, B D Kahan.   

Abstract

While cyclosporine is recommended to be used only in conjunction with monitoring of its blood concentrations, the utility of these measurements in preventing treatment failure is not established. In a group of 52 patients trough levels and steady-state concentrations were monitored in serum and whole blood by specific (SP) and nonspecific (NS) assays (polyclonal radioimmunoassay, PR; fluorescence polarization immunoassay, FP; high-pressure liquid chromatography, HP). From as many as 10 determinations of trough level and steady state concentrations during the first 40 days after renal transplantation, the lowest measurement was selected. In the case of an acute rejection episode within that time period, only values until that event were considered. Trough level measurements in serum by PR/NS and by FP/NS and in whole blood by HP/SP were not significantly different between patients with and patients without rejection episodes. However, simultaneously measured steady-state values (serum/PR/NS and serum/FP/NS) were significantly lower in patients suffering from rejection (with rejection SS/serum/PR/NS mean = 127 ng/ml, SD = 41 ng/ml; without rejection mean = 163 ng/ml, SD = 60 ng/ml; P = 0.027, t test). This difference could not be demonstrated for steady state/whole blood/HP/SP measurements. A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the probability of rejection can be decreased by up to 40% if steady state/serum/PR/NS or steady state/serum/FP/NS values never drop below 250 ng/ml early after renal transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2023881     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015820926829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  9 in total

Review 1.  Consensus document: Hawk's Cay meeting on therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine.

Authors:  B D Kahan; L M Shaw; D Holt; J Grevel; A Johnston
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Blood cyclosporin concentrations and renal allograft dysfunction.

Authors:  D W Holt; J T Marsden; A Johnston; M Bewick; D H Taube
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-25

3.  High-fat meals increase the clearance of cyclosporine.

Authors:  S K Gupta; L Z Benet
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Area-under-the-curve monitoring of cyclosporine therapy: performance of different assay methods and their target concentrations.

Authors:  J Grevel; K L Napoli; S Gibbons; B D Kahan
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 5.  Optimization of cyclosporine therapy in renal transplantation by a pharmacokinetic strategy.

Authors:  B D Kahan; J Grevel
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  A radioimmunoassay to measure cyclosporin A in plasma and serum samples.

Authors:  P Donatsch; E Abisch; M Homberger; R Traber; M Trapp; R Voges
Journal:  J Immunoassay       Date:  1981

7.  Assessment of cyclosporin A in whole blood and plasma in five patients with different hematocrits.

Authors:  R P Agarwal; R A McPherson; G A Threatte
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  Cyclosporine monitoring in renal transplantation: area under the curve monitoring is superior to trough-level monitoring.

Authors:  J Grevel; M S Welsh; B D Kahan
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Immunosuppressive metabolites of cyclosporine in the blood of renal allograft recipients.

Authors:  T G Rosano; B M Freed; J Cerilli; N Lempert
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.939

  9 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacodynamic monitoring of cyclosporin.

Authors:  W M Awni
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Optimisation of immunosuppressive therapy using pharmacokinetic principles.

Authors:  J Grevel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and models in clinical trials.

Authors:  J L Steimer; M E Ebelin; J Van Bree
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 4.  Methods for clinical monitoring of cyclosporin in transplant patients.

Authors:  R J Dumont; M H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.