Literature DB >> 8334392

Intraocular pressure and visual field decay in chronic glaucoma.

J Weber1, W Koll, G K Krieglstein.   

Abstract

A total of 41 eyes of 28 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and low-tension glaucoma (group 1) were followed for 12-72 months with tonometry and automated perimetry. A second group consisting of 13 eyes (9 patients) with secondary glaucoma (pigment dispersion, goniodysgenesis, ciliolenticular block and chronic angle closure) was followed for 13-60 months. None of the eyes had undergone filtering surgery during the follow-up period. The visual field decay was calculated by means of regression analysis of the mean defect. There was a significant correlation between visual field decay and both mean intraocular pressure (IOP, P > 95%) and maximal IOP (P > 98%) in the secondary glaucomas, which was not found in group 1. IOP oscillation expressed by the standard deviation of IOP was significantly correlated with progressive visual field loss in both groups. The slope of visual field decay was independent of the functional damage at the initial examination. Even if the influence of IOP level on the course of primary chronic glaucoma may have been masked by other factors that have a great interindividual variation, the oscillation of IOP seems to be at least as important as the level of IOP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8334392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ger J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0941-2921


  8 in total

1.  Visual field progression: comparison of Humphrey Statpac2 and pointwise linear regression analysis.

Authors:  A I McNaught; D P Crabb; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  How often do patients need visual field tests?

Authors:  A C Viswanathan; R A Hitchings; F W Fitzke
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2.

Authors:  A C Viswanathan; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Authors:  F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings; D Poinoosawmy; A I McNaught; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  A C Viswanathan; D P Crabb; A I McNaught; M C Westcott; D Kamal; D F Garway-Heath; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Vascular risk factors in glaucoma: the results of a national survey.

Authors:  Nicola Orzalesi; Luca Rossetti; Stefano Omboni
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 7.  Oxygen and blood flow: players in the pathogenesis of glaucoma.

Authors:  Maneli Mozaffarieh; Matthias C Grieshaber; Josef Flammer
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  Genome-wide association study of intraocular pressure identifies the GLCCI1/ICA1 region as a glaucoma susceptibility locus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 6.150

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.