Literature DB >> 17209742

Explaining the footsteps, belly dancer, Wenceslas, and kickback illusions.

Piers D L Howe1, Peter G Thompson, Stuart M Anstis, Hersh Sagreiya, Margaret S Livingstone.   

Abstract

The footsteps illusion (FI) demonstrates that an object's background can have a profound effect on the object's perceived speed. This illusion consists of a yellow bar and a blue bar that move over a black-and-white, striped background. Although the bars move at a constant rate, they appear to repeatedly accelerate and decelerate in antiphase with each other. Previously, this illusion has been explained in terms of the variations in contrast at the leading and trailing edges of the bars that occur as the bars traverse the striped background. Here, we show that this explanation is inadequate and instead propose that for each bar, the bar's leading edge, trailing edge, lateral edges, and the surrounding background edges all contribute to the bar's perceived speed and that the degree to which each edge contributes to the motion percept is determined by that edge's contrast. We show that this theory can explain all the data on the FI as well as the belly dancer and Wenceslas illusions. We conclude by presenting a new illusion, the kickback illusion, which, although geometrically similar to the FI, is mediated by a different mechanism, namely, reverse phi motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17209742      PMCID: PMC2637218          DOI: 10.1167/6.12.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  20 in total

1.  Footsteps and inchworms: illusions show that contrast affects apparent speed.

Authors:  S Anstis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Illusory reversal of visual depth and movement during changes of contrast.

Authors:  S M Anstis; B J Rogers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Moving objects appear to slow down at low contrasts.

Authors:  Stuart Anstis
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul

4.  Factors affecting footsteps: contrast can change the apparent speed, amplitude and direction of motion.

Authors:  Stuart Anstis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Moving stimuli define the shape of stationary chromatic patterns.

Authors:  N Goda; Y Ejima
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Phi movement as a subtraction process.

Authors:  S M Anstis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Color and luminance share a common motion pathway.

Authors:  P Cavanagh; O E Favreau
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast.

Authors:  P Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Perceived velocity of moving chromatic gratings.

Authors:  P Cavanagh; C W Tyler; O E Favreau
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  The influence of spatial frequency and contrast on the perception of moving patterns.

Authors:  F W Campbell; L Maffei
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  3 in total

1.  Illusory movement of dotted lines.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ito; Stuart Anstis; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Second-Order Footsteps Illusions.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Kitaoka; Stuart Anstis
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-12-24

3.  A Computational Mechanism for Seeing Dynamic Deformation.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe; Masataka Sawayama
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.