Literature DB >> 8332433

Satiation or availability? Effects of attention, memory, and imagery on the perception of ambiguous figures.

K L Horlitz1, A O'Leary.   

Abstract

The prolonged-inspection technique has been used to demonstrate effects of satiation on the perception of ambiguous figures. We propose that the inspection phase, in which subjects view an unambiguous version of the stimulus prior to observing the ambiguous figure, does not create neural fatigue but rather provides a context in which the alternative percept is apprehended and gains perceptual strength through processes such as imagination or memory. The consequent availability of the alternative organization drives the perceptual phenomena that have been thought to reflect satiation. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that (1) preexperimental exposure to the target figures and (2) allocation of attention to the inspection figures were both necessary in order to obtain results similar to those predicted by the satiation model. In Experiment 2, we obtained similar results, finding that effects of prior inspection were greater the greater the amount and availability of information regarding the alternative percept during the inspection phase. Subjects who generated visual images of the noninspected alternative during inspection yielded results comparable to those from subjects to whom both versions were presented visually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8332433     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  24 in total

1.  PERCEPTION OF AMBIGUOUS FIGURE-GROUND PATTERNS AS A FUNCTION OF PAST EXPERIENCE.

Authors:  R J VETTER
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1965-02

2.  Further evidence of failure of reversal of ambiguous figures by uninformed subjects.

Authors:  I Rock; K Mitchener
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Attention capture by novel stimuli.

Authors:  W A Johnston; K J Hawley; S H Plewe; J M Elliott; M J DeWitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-12

4.  Comparison processes on visual mental images.

Authors:  S Bagnara; F Simion; M E Tagliabue; C Umiltà
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-03

5.  Necessary considerations for a theory of form perception: a theoretical and empirical reply to Boselie and Leeuwenberg (1986)

Authors:  M A Peterson; J Hochberg
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The local character of perspective organization.

Authors:  M W von Grünau; S Wiggin; M Reed
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-04

7.  The effect of inattention on form perception.

Authors:  I Rock; D Gutman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Levels of equivalence in imagery and perception.

Authors:  R A Finke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Locus of habituation in the human newborn.

Authors:  A Slater; V Morison; D Rose
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  VISUAL EXPERIENCE IN INFANTS: DECREASED ATTENTION TO FAMILIAR PATTERNS RELATIVE TO NOVEL ONES.

Authors:  R L FANTZ
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Adaptation effects and reversible figures: a comment on Horlitz and O'Leary.

Authors:  G M Long; T C Toppino
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-11

3.  Selective biasing of a specific bistable-figure percept involves fMRI signal changes in frontostriatal circuits: a step toward unlocking the neural correlates of top-down control and self-regulation.

Authors:  Amir Raz; Melissa Lamar; Jason T Buhle; Michael J Kane; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Am J Clin Hypn       Date:  2007-10

Review 4.  The Complex Interplay Between Multisensory Integration and Perceptual Awareness.

Authors:  O Deroy; N Faivre; C Lunghi; C Spence; M Aller; U Noppeney
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.286

Review 5.  Top-down influences on ambiguous perception: the role of stable and transient states of the observer.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Matteo Valsecchi; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  What happens in the brain of meditators when perception changes but not the stimulus?

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Evelyn Friedel; Lukas Hecker; Stefan Schmidt; Marc Wittmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Priming and reversals of the perceived ambiguous orientation of a structure-from-motion shape and relation to personality traits.

Authors:  Leo Poom; Melina Matin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Visual working memory contents bias ambiguous structure from motion perception.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.