Literature DB >> 18030926

Selective biasing of a specific bistable-figure percept involves fMRI signal changes in frontostriatal circuits: a step toward unlocking the neural correlates of top-down control and self-regulation.

Amir Raz1, Melissa Lamar, Jason T Buhle, Michael J Kane, Bradley S Peterson.   

Abstract

Attention, suggestion, context and expectation can all exert top-down influence on bottom-up processes (e.g., stimulus-driven mechanisms). Identifying the functional neuroanatomy that subserves top-down influences on sensory information processing can unlock the neural substrates of how suggestion can modulate behavior. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we scanned 10 healthy participants (five men) viewing five bistable figures. Participants received a directional cue to perceive a particular spatial orientation a few seconds before the bistable figure appeared. After presentation, participants pressed a button to indicate their locking into the one desired orientation of the two possible interpretations. Participants additionally performed tests of impulse control and sustained attention. Our findings reveal the role of specific frontostriatal structures in selecting a particular orientation for bistable figures, including dorsolateral prefrontal regions and the putamen. Additional contrasts further bolstered the role of the frontostriatal system in the top-down processing of competing visual perceptions. Separate correlations of behavioral variables with fMRI activations support the idea that the frontostriatal system may mediate attentional control when selecting among competing visual perceptions. These results may generalize to other psychological functions. With special relevance to clinical neuroscience and applications involving attention, expectation and suggestion (e.g., hypnosis), our results address the importance of frontostriatal circuitry in behavioral modulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18030926      PMCID: PMC2386759          DOI: 10.1080/00029157.2007.10401611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Hypn        ISSN: 0002-9157


  76 in total

1.  Differences in top-down influences on the reversal rate of different categories of reversible figures.

Authors:  D Strüber; M Stadler
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Hypnotic visual illusion alters color processing in the brain.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; W L Thompson; M F Costantini-Ferrando; N M Alpert; D Spiegel
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 3.  The neurobiology of repetitive behaviors: clues to the neurobiology of Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  A M Graybiel; J J Canales
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  2001

Review 4.  Neuroimaging of developmental psychopathologies: the importance of self-regulatory and neuroplastic processes in adolescence.

Authors:  Alexandra L Spessot; Kerstin J Plessen; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Critique of claims of improved visual acuity after hypnotic suggestion.

Authors:  Amir Raz; Zohar R Zephrani; Heather R Schweizer; Gerald P Marinoff
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 6.  Anatomy of attentional networks.

Authors:  Amir Raz
Journal:  Anat Rec B New Anat       Date:  2004-11

7.  Frontostriatal relationships on normal and pathological aging of the human brain.

Authors:  N S Orzhekhovskaya
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

8.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  F Tong; K Nakayama; J T Vaughan; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of tic suppression in Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  B S Peterson; P Skudlarski; A W Anderson; H Zhang; J C Gatenby; C M Lacadie; J F Leckman; J C Gore
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1998-04

10.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  The top-down regulation from the prefrontal cortex to insula via hypnotic aversion suggestions reduces smoking craving.

Authors:  Xiaoming Li; Lijun Chen; Ru Ma; Haibao Wang; Li Wan; Ying Wang; Junjie Bu; Wei Hong; Wanwan Lv; Sabine Vollstädt-Klein; Yihong Yang; Xiaochu Zhang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Synchronous and opposite roles of the parietal and prefrontal cortices in bistable perception: a double-coil TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Marine Vernet; Anna-Katharine Brem; Faranak Farzan; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Perceptual, cognitive, and personality rigidity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Mirella Díaz-Santos; Bo Cao; Arash Yazdanbakhsh; Daniel J Norton; Sandy Neargarder; Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Differences in neural activity when processing emotional arousal and valence in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Angela Tseng; Zhishun Wang; Yuankai Huo; Suzanne Goh; James A Russell; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Genomic Analyses of Visual Cognition: Perceptual Rivalry and Top-Down Control.

Authors:  Biqing Chen; Zijian Zhu; Ren Na; Wan Fang; Wenxia Zhang; Qin Zhou; Shanbi Zhou; Han Lei; Ailong Huang; Tingmei Chen; Dongsheng Ni; Yuping Gu; Jianing Liu; Fang Fang; Yi Rao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Answering questions about consciousness by modeling perception as covert behavior.

Authors:  Gustav Markkula
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-16

7.  Elucidating unconscious processing with instrumental hypnosis.

Authors:  Mathieu Landry; Krystèle Appourchaux; Amir Raz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.