Literature DB >> 8332415

Spatial context affects the Poggendorff illusion.

M J Spivey-Knowlton1, B Bridgeman.   

Abstract

The Poggendorff illusion has often been explained as purely an interaction between the parallels and the transversals. The present study demonstrates that additional spatial context exerts an influence on this illusion. In Experiment 1, we examined the effects of a surrounding tilted frame (complete and degraded versions) on collinearity adjustments in the upright and rotated Poggendorff figures. The frame's orientation was always oblique. Relative to the no-frame condition, frames decreased error in collinearity adjustments in the upright Poggendorff figure, and increased error in the rotated Poggendorff figure. In Experiment 2, a circumscribing circle did not cause an orientation-inhibition effect (Ebenholtz & Utrie, 1982, 1983), suggesting that the effect of the frame on the Poggendorff illusion may not be closely related to the rod-and-frame effect. In Experiment 3, orientation of a central texture modulated the magnitude of the illusion. The results do not serve to explain the mechanisms behind the Poggendorff illusion, but they do demonstrate the importance of visual reference frames in understanding perceived misalignment.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8332415     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  25 in total

1.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright with displaced visual fields.

Authors:  S E ASCH; H A WITKIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-06

2.  The effects of exposure duration and surrounding frames on direct and indirect tilt aftereffects and illusions.

Authors:  P Wenderoth; R van der Zwan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-10

3.  The distinction between the rod-and-frame illusion and the rod-and-frame test.

Authors:  P M Wenderoth
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The differential effects of brief exposures and surrounding contours on direct and indirect tilt illusions.

Authors:  P Wenderoth; S Johnstone
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Depth separation fails to modulate the orientation-inhibition effect.

Authors:  S M Ebenholtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-06

6.  Peripheral circular contours inhibit the visual orientation control system.

Authors:  S M Ebenholtz; J W Utrie
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1983-04

7.  Recognition processes and occurrence of the dot Poggendorff illusion.

Authors:  J Predebon
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1983-04

8.  Mistracking in alignment illusions.

Authors:  W H Hotopf
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Absence of relational determination in the rod-and-frame effect.

Authors:  S M Ebenholtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

10.  The Poggendorff illusion: an illusion of linear extent?

Authors:  S Greist-Bousquet; H R Schiffman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  3 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Haptic Perception of Complex Shapes.

Authors:  Jonathan M Ehrich; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  Poggendorff rides again!

Authors:  Vebjørn Ekroll; Alan Gilchrist; Jan Koenderink; Andrea van Doorn; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-01-06

3.  The Poggendorff illusion in Ruben's Descent from the Cross in Antwerp: Does the illusion even matter?

Authors:  Olga Daneyko; Natale Stucchi; Daniele Zavagno
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2022-10-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.