Literature DB >> 8331306

Nonangiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency.

W Stanford1, J R Galvin, B H Thompson, M Grover-McKay, D J Skorton.   

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass graft patency can be assessed using the indirect techniques of evaluating patients' symptoms and exercise tolerance, changes in stress electrocardiogram, radioisotope regional perfusion, and myocardial wall contraction. The direct techniques assess graft patency directly by visualizing grafts using conventional computed tomography (CT), ultrafast CT, magnetic resonance imaging, digital subtraction angiography, and echocardiography. The advantages and disadvantages of each of these modalities are reviewed. At the present time, ultrafast CT and possibly magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler appear to be the only techniques besides angiography that can consistently evaluate bypass graft patency. Although they have the advantage of being minimally invasive, they cannot show graft stenosis or sequential graft patency. These techniques are best used in following patients after coronary bypass graft surgery and ruling out graft closure as the source of chest pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8331306     DOI: 10.1007/bf01151431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  48 in total

1.  Computed tomographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with fast dynamic scanning.

Authors:  R E Slaughter; J B Partridge
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  1990-05

2.  Identification of recurrent ischemia after coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison of positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  T H Marwick; A Lafont; R T Go; D A Underwood; G B Saha; W J MacIntyre
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Coronary arteries: breath-hold MR angiography.

Authors:  R R Edelman; W J Manning; D Burstein; S Paulin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring during exercise before and after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  M Nanna; P A Chandraratna; C R McKay; G Cohlmia; M Trigleth; S H Rahimtoola; G C Griffith
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Exercise echocardiography: detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal left ventricular wall motion at rest.

Authors:  T Ryan; C G Vasey; C F Presti; J A O'Donnell; H Feigenbaum; W F Armstrong
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Stress electrocardiography in the evaluation of aortocoronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  A Dodek; D G Kassebaum; H E Griswold
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Clinical value of coronary bypass graft evaluation with CT.

Authors:  J D Godwin; R M Califf; M Korobkin; A V Moore; R S Breiman; Y Kong
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Improvement in left ventricular function after myocardial revascularization: assessment by first-pass rest and exercise nuclear angiography.

Authors:  C K Hellman; M L Kamath; D H Schmidt; J Anholm; F Blau; W D Johnson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Relation between QRS changes and left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  R D Floyd; G S Wagner; E H Austin; D C Sabiston; R H Jones
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Upright bicycle exercise echocardiography after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  S G Sawada; W E Judson; T Ryan; W F Armstrong; H Feigenbaum
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.