Literature DB >> 1563877

Identification of recurrent ischemia after coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison of positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography.

T H Marwick1, A Lafont, R T Go, D A Underwood, G B Saha, W J MacIntyre.   

Abstract

Current techniques for the detection of recurrent coronary stenoses following bypass grafting have shown disappointing diagnostic accuracy. This study used the same dipyridamole-handgrip stress to compare the accuracy of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography, in 50 consecutive post-bypass patients undergoing coronary arteriography at a mean interval of 6.5 years after surgery. Significant stenoses in native coronary vessels (greater than 50% diameter) or grafts (greater than 70% diameter) were defined by quantitative angiography. Forty-six patients had recurrent or residual stenoses, 43 (93%) had a perfusion defect identified by positron emission tomography, and 35 (76%) were identified by single photon emission computed tomography (P = 0.04). Fourteen of the 17 patients (82%) without previous Q-wave myocardial infarction were identified by positron emission tomography; 10 of the 17 (59%) were detected by single photon emission computed tomography (P = NS). Stress-induced perfusion defects were demonstrated by positron emission tomography in 19 patients; of this group, thallium imaging identified reversible defects in 11, showed no perfusion defect in 1, and portrayed a persistent defect in 7 patients. Significant graft disease was present in 33 patients; perfusion defects were identified by positron emission tomography in 30 (91%), and by single photon emission computed tomography in 24 (73%, P = NS). Four patients were fully revascularized, without significant recurrent coronary disease; normal perfusion was present in 3 (75%) by positron emission tomography, and 4 (100%) by single photon emission computed tomography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1563877     DOI: 10.1016/0167-5273(92)90052-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  3 in total

Review 1.  What is the current status of quantification and nuclear medicine in cardiology?

Authors:  G Hör
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-07

Review 2.  Nonangiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency.

Authors:  W Stanford; J R Galvin; B H Thompson; M Grover-McKay; D J Skorton
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-06

Review 3.  Diagnostic and Management Strategies in Patients with Late Recurrent Angina after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Ruben W de Winter; Mohammed S Rahman; Pepijn A van Diemen; Stefan P Schumacher; Ruurt A Jukema; Yvemarie B O Somsen; Albert C van Rossum; Niels J Verouden; Ibrahim Danad; Ronak Delewi; Alexander Nap; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.955

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.