Literature DB >> 3356843

Exercise echocardiography: detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal left ventricular wall motion at rest.

T Ryan1, C G Vasey, C F Presti, J A O'Donnell, H Feigenbaum, W F Armstrong.   

Abstract

Most studies investigating the ability of exercise two-dimensional echocardiography to identify patients with coronary artery disease have included patients with left ventricular wall motion abnormalities at rest. This has the effect of increasing sensitivity because patients with only abnormalities at rest are detected. To determine the diagnostic utility of exercise echocardiography in patients with normal wall motion at rest, 64 patients were studied with exercise echocardiography in conjunction with routine treadmill exercise testing before coronary cineangiography. All 24 patients who had no angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease had a negative exercise echocardiogram (100% specificity). Nine of 40 patients with coronary artery disease (defined as greater than or equal to 50% narrowing of at least one major vessel) also had a negative exercise echocardiogram (78% sensitivity). Of the nine patients with a false negative exercise echocardiographic study, six had single vessel disease. Among 25 patients with single vessel disease, exercise echocardiography was significantly more sensitive (p = 0.01) than treadmill exercise testing alone (76 versus 36%, respectively). Among 15 patients with multivessel disease, the two tests demonstrated similar sensitivity (80%). In conclusion, exercise echocardiography is highly specific and moderately sensitive for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal wall motion at rest. Although exercise echocardiography is significantly more sensitive than treadmill exercise electrocardiographic testing alone in patients with single vessel disease, the two tests are similar in their ability to detect coronary artery disease in patients with multivessel disease and normal wall motion at rest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3356843     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)90056-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  16 in total

1.  A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors.

Authors:  Yoshinori Noguchi; Shizuko Nagata-Kobayashi; James E Stahl; John B Wong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Diagnosis of ischemic heart disease with exercise echocardiography: Comparison of images obtained at peak- and post-exercise.

Authors:  Yutaka Hirano; Tadahiko Yamamoto; Hisakazu Uehara; Yoshinao Ozasa; Satoru Yamada; Hiroshi Ikawa; Kinji Ishikawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging versus two-dimensional echocardiography: comparative value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Predicting ischaemic events in the perioperative period: in search of the perfect tool.

Authors:  J C Tardif; M Juneau
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 5.  The role of stress echocardiography versus stress perfusion: a view from the other side.

Authors:  F A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Evaluating patients with chest pain.

Authors:  J Sweeney; N Goldschlager
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-11

Review 7.  Nonangiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency.

Authors:  W Stanford; J R Galvin; B H Thompson; M Grover-McKay; D J Skorton
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-06

8.  Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of the echocardiography and troponin-T test combination in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Pietro Di Pasquale; Sergio Cannizzaro; Sebastiano Scalzo; Giorgio Maringhini; Filippo M Sarullo; Antonina Cacia; Salvatore Paterna
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Roman Leischik; Birgit Dworrak; Fabian Sanchis-Gomar; Alejandro Lucia; Thomas Buck; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-07

Review 10.  Evaluating coronary artery disease noninvasively--which test for whom?

Authors:  T M Chou; T M Amidon
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.