Literature DB >> 8331230

Cancer detection with whole-body PET using 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

C K Hoh1, R A Hawkins, J A Glaspy, M Dahlbom, N Y Tse, E J Hoffman, C Schiepers, Y Choi, S Rege, E Nitzsche.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was done to determine the feasibility and potential utility of whole-body PET using the glucose analogue 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) for the detection of primary malignancies and metastatic lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized study of whole-body FDG-PET imaging carried out at a large university teaching hospital in Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A. The study group consisted of all patients referred for PET imaging (87) with a suspected diagnosis of primary or recurrent malignancy and who had eventual histological confirmation of their lesions.
RESULTS: In the 87 patients, whole-body PET studies were positive (presence of focal FDG uptake relative to surrounding tissues uptake) in 61 of 70 patients (87%) with subsequent biopsy-confirmed primary or recurrent malignant lesions, including carcinomas of breast, lung, ovary, prostate, colon, urinary bladder, and gallbladder origin, as well as malignant melanoma, carcinoid, osteosarcoma, lymphoma, and spinal cord astrocytoma. The PET images revealed no focal hypermetabolism at the known site of tumor in patients with primary prostate carcinoma (two), microscopic ovarian carcinoma (two), breast carcinoma (one), low-grade carcinoid tumors (two), and one patient with recurrent microscopic osteogenic sarcoma. The PET studies detected the primary lesion in 15 of 17 patients with breast carcinoma and in 6 of 6 patients with primary lung carcinoma. Of the 17 patients with benign biopsies, 13 patients had FDG-PET studies without focal areas of uptake.
CONCLUSION: Because of the high glycolytic rate of malignant tissue, the whole-body FDG-PET technique has promise in the detection of a wide variety of both primary and metastatic malignancies. The presence of FDG uptake in benign inflammatory conditions may limit the specificity of the technique. The sensitivity for the detection of malignant lesions was 87% and the positive predictive value was 94%. The whole-body FDG-PET method is promising both in determining the nature of a localized lesion and in defining the systemic extent of malignant disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8331230     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199307000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  39 in total

1.  Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Gerald Antoch; Todd Blodgett; Lutz F Freudenberg; Tim Akhurst; Stephan Mueller
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and plexiform neurofibromas: correlation with malignant transformation.

Authors:  L L Tsai; L Drubach; F Fahey; M Irons; S Voss; N J Ullrich
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  The impact of image fusion in resolving discrepant findings between FDG-PET and MRI/CT in patients with gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  Cheng-Chien Tsai; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Koon-Kwan Ng; Chyong-Huey Lai; Swei Hsueh; Pan-Fu Kao; Ting-Chang Chang; Ji-Hong Hong; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  PET/CT and breast cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Zangheri; Cristina Messa; Maria Picchio; Luigi Gianolli; Claudio Landoni; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Whither the PET scan? The role of PET imaging in the staging and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Gennari; Arnoldo Piccardo; Vania Altrinetti; Davide Corradengo; Giampiero Villavecchia; Andrea De Censi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  A novel approach to assess the treatment response using Gaussian random field in PET.

Authors:  Mengdie Wang; Ning Guo; Guangshu Hu; Georges El Fakhri; Hui Zhang; Quanzheng Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Oncologic positron emission tomography: a surgical perspective.

Authors:  Todd O Moore; Landis K Griffeth
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

8.  Staging of the axilla in breast cancer: accurate in vivo assessment using positron emission tomography with 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

Authors:  I C Smith; K N Ogston; P Whitford; F W Smith; P Sharp; M Norton; I D Miller; A K Ah-See; S D Heys; J A Jibril; O Eremin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Usefulness of additional delayed regional F-18 Fluorodeoxy-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in the lymph node staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients.

Authors:  Young So; June-Key Chung; Jae Min Jeong; Dong Soo Lee; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.