Literature DB >> 8330173

Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomosis.

P M Sagar1, N Couse, M Kerin, J May, J MacFie.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was carried out to determine whether use of a high-pressure closed-suction intraperitoneal drain was associated with a reduction in morbidity rate after colorectal resection and to examine the influence of drainage on postoperative fluid collections. A consecutive series of 148 patients who underwent colonic or colorectal resection were randomized to receive no drain (n = 51) or a high-pressure closed-suction drain for either 3 (n = 47) or 7 (n = 47) days. Three patients were excluded. All patients underwent abdominal ultrasonography on days 3 and 7 and those undergoing left-sided colorectal resection (n = 96) received a water-soluble contrast enema on day 7. The three groups of patients were similar in age, sex, diagnosis and the numbers of sutured and stapled anastomoses. The presence of a drain did not influence the postoperative morbidity or mortality rate. If the anastomosis leaked, neither faeces nor pus emerged from the drain. Ultrasonographic detection of a fluid collection was of no value: such collections bore no relationship to radiological or clinical leaks or the postoperative course. Routine use of a high-pressure suction drain after colorectal resection appears to be unnecessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8330173     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800800640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  21 in total

1.  [Significance of drains in surgery].

Authors:  M Niedergethmann; F Bludau; N Dusch; K Nowak; S Post
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Is Prophylactic Drainage of Peritoneal Cavity after Gut Surgery Necessary?: A Non-Randomized Comparative Study from a Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Salamat Khan; Pranil Rai; Gorakh Misra
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-10-01

3.  Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Henrik Petrowsky; Nicolas Demartines; Valentin Rousson; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Is prophylactic placement of drains necessary after subtotal gastrectomy?

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Seung Bong Yang; Vijay Kumar Jaiswal; Jay N Shah; Manish Shreshtha; Rajesh Gongal
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  A multi-disciplinary review of the potential association between closed-suction drains and surgical site infection.

Authors:  Alyssa J Reiffel; Philip S Barie; Jason A Spector
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.150

6.  Management of large bowel injury during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  C V Hegde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-10

7.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  To Drain or Not to Drain after Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Atul Samaiya
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Lefebure; J J Tuech; V Bridoux; B Costaglioli; M Scotte; P Teniere; F Michot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Use of intra-abdominal drains.

Authors:  Frances J Puleo; Nitin Mishra; Jason F Hall
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.