Literature DB >> 27011566

To Drain or Not to Drain after Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Atul Samaiya1.   

Abstract

Prophylactic drainage of abdominal cavity after GI surgery has been widely practiced. The most important signal function of prophylactic drain is to detect early complications. But the same drains could be the cause of some of the complications. Although there is a considerable theoretical and practical evidences in favor of drainage, the dispute about "to drain or not to drain" the peritoneal cavity after elective colorectal surgery remains open. Unfortunately, the principle of drainage is not based on any scientific data. During the last three decades, surgeons have made efforts to investigate the value of prophylactic drainage after colorectal surgery. However, the results of trials are contradictory due to lack of quality and/or statistical power and therefore do not provide an answer to the clinical question. A systematic review of studies suggests that there is insufficient evidence for routine use of drain after colorectal surgery. Despite evidence-based data questioning prophylactic drainage of abdominal cavity in many instances, most surgeons around the world continue to use drains on a routine basis until now. There are strong evidences in literature in favor of no apparent benefit of drainage for supra-peritoneal anastomoses; however, there is still controversies regarding drainage of infra-peritoneal rectal anastomoses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Colorectal surgery; Drain; No drain

Year:  2015        PMID: 27011566      PMCID: PMC4775688          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1259-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  39 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal surgery and anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  P B Soeters; J P J G M de Zoete; C H C Dejong; N S Williams; C G M I Baeten
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  The aetiology of post-operative abdominal adhesions. An experimental study.

Authors:  H ELLIS
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  E C Jesus; A Karliczek; D Matos; A A Castro; A N Atallah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

4.  Drainage of the abdomen.

Authors:  H L Duthie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1972-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Association for Surgical Research.

Authors:  F Merad; J M Hay; A Fingerhut; E Yahchouchi; Y Laborde; E Pélissier; S Msika; Y Flamant
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Prophylactic abdominal drainage after elective colonic resection and suprapromontory anastomosis: a multicenter study controlled by randomization. French Associations for Surgical Research.

Authors:  F Merad; E Yahchouchi; J M Hay; A Fingerhut; Y Laborde; O Langlois-Zantain
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-03

7.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients.

Authors:  Chien Yuh Yeh; Chung Rong Changchien; Jeng-Yi Wang; Jinn-Shiun Chen; Hong Hwa Chen; Jy-Ming Chiang; Reiping Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The effect of surgical drainage materials on colonic healing.

Authors:  S R Smith; J C Connolly; P W Crane; O J Gilmore
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Value of pelvic suction-irrigation in reducing morbidity of low anterior resection of the rectum--a ten-year experience.

Authors:  B S Gingold; D G Jagelman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  2 in total

1.  Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Based Plasma Metabolomics Study of the Effects of Moxibustion with Seed-Sized Moxa Cone on Hyperlipidemia.

Authors:  Qinghua Shao; Jie Cheng; Yi Li; Guangxia Ni
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 2.  Laparoscopic splenectomy after trauma: Who, when and how. A systematic review.

Authors:  Pietro Fransvea; Gianluca Costa; Angelo Serao; Francesco Cortese; Genoveffa Balducci; Gabriele Sganga; Pierluigi Marini
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.