Literature DB >> 9059374

Hypertension management in general practice.

M Whitfield1, A Hughes.   

Abstract

The views of 542 general practitioners (GPs) and 64 consultant physicians about the management of patients with hypertension in general practice were sought by postal questionnaire. 325 (60%) of the GPs and 45 (70%) of the consultant physicians completed the questionnaire. For a 40-year-old man with no other cardiovascular risk factors most general practitioners would intervene with drugs at blood pressure levels specified in published guidelines, whereas many local consultants and older GPs would consider drug treatment at lower levels. About 75% of GPs, compared with 87% of consultants, would suggest drug treatment in a woman of 70 years with a BP of 180/100 mmHg. Although consultants tended to expect GPs to order more tests when investigating a patient with hypertension than the GPs actually did, both GPs and consultants would order similar types of investigations apart from imaging. Consultants had different expectations about the frequency with which general practitioners should record patients' blood pressure and the GPs' ability to prevent cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. Many older GPs and consultants seem to have unrealistic expectations of the value of treating patients with hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9059374      PMCID: PMC1296108          DOI: 10.1177/014107689709000105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  9 in total

1.  Which hypertensive patients should be treated?

Authors:  R Jackson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Three year follow up of patients with raised blood pressure identified at health checks in general practice.

Authors:  D Mant; C McKinlay; A Fuller; T Randall; E M Fullard; J Muir
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-05-20

3.  Physician approach to the recognition and initial management of hypertension. Results of a statewide survey of Maryland physicians.

Authors:  T P Cloher; P K Whelton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-03

4.  Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society.

Authors:  P Sever; G Beevers; C Bulpitt; A Lever; L Ramsay; J Reid; J Swales
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-10

Review 5.  Blood pressure management: individualized treatment based on absolute risk and the potential for benefit.

Authors:  M H Alderman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Control of blood pressure in Scotland: the rule of halves.

Authors:  W C Smith; A J Lee; I K Crombie; H Tunstall-Pedoe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-14

7.  Management of raised blood pressure in New Zealand: a discussion document.

Authors:  R Jackson; P Barham; J Bills; T Birch; L McLennan; S MacMahon; T Maling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-10

Review 8.  Epidemiology of hypertension.

Authors:  P K Whelton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-07-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Control of blood pressure and risk of first acute myocardial infarction: Skaraborg hypertension project.

Authors:  U Lindblad; L Råstam; L Rydén; J Ranstam; S O Isacsson; G Berglund
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-03-12
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Hypertension management in general practice.

Authors:  A J Isaacs
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Giving feedback to questionnaire responders--an essential task?

Authors:  M Whitfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.386

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.