Literature DB >> 8325573

Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance.

P H Dejonckere1, C Obbens, G M de Moor, G H Wieneke.   

Abstract

A standardized, perceptually based description of hoarseness is of importance for clinical purposes (e.g. therapy evaluation) as well as in research on voice disorders. The reliability and relevance of perceptual parameters are investigated. The GRBAS scale parameters quite well fit the criteria: low intrajudge and interjudge variance but high intervoice variance. The best correlation between judges (0.7) is found for the overall grade of severity. Impressions of the asthenic-strained voice quality are less consistent, but still show a significant interjudge correlation. The overall grade of severity seems to be mainly determined by the component breathiness. Roughness and breathiness are negatively correlated with each other. Tonus is correlated neither with roughness nor breathiness. The GRBAS profiles significantly differ between the different pathological groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8325573     DOI: 10.1159/000266220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)        ISSN: 0015-5705


  10 in total

1.  The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia.

Authors:  A L Webb; P N Carding; I J Deary; K MacKenzie; N Steen; J A Wilson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Does the subjective assessment of roughness correlate with a computer-aided measurement of irregularity index?].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Iven; M Jessen; C Schwemmle
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Schwemmle; C Iven; M Jessen; T Nawka
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  The INFVo perceptual rating scale for substitution voicing: development and reliability.

Authors:  Mieke Moerman; Jean-Pierre Martens; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Else de Haan; Stephanie Grand; Christophe Tessier; Virginie Woisard; Philippe Dejonckere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Normative Values of Client-Reported Outcome Measures and Self-Ratings of Six Voice Parameters via the VoiceEvalU8 App.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo; Brigit Corej; Jeremy Wolfberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Changes after voice therapy in objective and subjective voice measurements of pediatric patients with vocal nodules.

Authors:  Ciler Zahide Tezcaner; Selmin Karatayli Ozgursoy; Selmin Karatayli Ozgursoy; Isil Sati; Gursel Dursun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Reliability of the Italian INFVo scale and correlations with objective measures and VHI scores.

Authors:  A Schindler; D Ginocchio; M Atac; P Maruzzi; S Madaschi; F Ottaviani; F Mozzanica
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Modulation Spectra Morphological Parameters: A New Method to Assess Voice Pathologies according to the GRBAS Scale.

Authors:  Laureano Moro-Velázquez; Jorge Andrés Gómez-García; Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente; Gustavo Andrade-Miranda
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Is OperaVOX a clinically useful tool for the assessment of voice in a general ENT clinic?

Authors:  Richard Teck Kee Siau; Jay Goswamy; Sue Jones; Sadie Khwaja
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2017-04-21

10.  How Effectively Do People Remember Voice Disordered Speech? An Investigation of the Serial-Position Curve.

Authors:  Scott R Schroeder; Hannah N Rembrandt
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-01-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.