Literature DB >> 15868131

[Does the subjective assessment of roughness correlate with a computer-aided measurement of irregularity index?].

M Ptok1, C Iven, M Jessen, C Schwemmle.   

Abstract

For routine clinical purposes dysphonic voices are assessed using the GRBAS scale or analogues. An objective measurement often includes jitter measurements. Here we raised the question of whether roughness estimates correlate with a computer-aided measurement of the vocal fold cycle irregularity in 78 patients who read a standard text ("Nordwind und Sonne"). The samples were evaluated by 19 speech and voice therapy students according to the degree of roughness. The irregularity index was calculated according to the procedures suggested by Fourcin. Data were subjected to correlation analysis. A significant correlation was found between the irregularity index and the subjective roughness scaling. These data indicate that objective measurements of vibratory cycle irregularity during text reading can be used for clinical purposes in addition to subjective roughness scaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 15868131     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-005-1250-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  20 in total

1.  Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia.

Authors:  F L Wuyts; M S De Bodt; P H Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  P Carding; E Carlson; R Epstein; L Mathieson; C Shewell
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.487

3.  Correlation of instrumental voice evaluation with perceptual voice analysis using a modified visual analog scale.

Authors:  Ping Yu; Joana Revis; Floris L Wuyts; Michel Zanaret; Antoine Giovanni
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.849

4.  [Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: correlation with acoustic parameters and reliability].

Authors:  F Núñez Batalla; P Corte Santos; G Sequeiros Santiago; B Señaris González; C Suárez Nieto
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2004 Jun-Jul

5.  What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters?

Authors:  B Millet; P H Dejonckere
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.849

6.  Perception of hoarseness by several classes of listeners.

Authors:  L C Anders; H Hollien; P Hurme; A Sonninen; J Wendler
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)       Date:  1988

7.  An improved technique for measurement of the relative noise level using a sound spectrograph.

Authors:  M Fujiu; S R Hibi; M Hirano
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)       Date:  1988

8.  Laryngographic analysis and intonation.

Authors:  E Abberton; A J Fourcin
Journal:  Br J Disord Commun       Date:  1972-04

Review 9.  Laryngograph: speech pattern element tools for therapy, training and assessment.

Authors:  A Fourcin; E Abberton; D Miller; D Howells
Journal:  Eur J Disord Commun       Date:  1995

10.  Implementation of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) basic protocol for assessing voice treatment effect.

Authors:  P H DeJonckere; L Crevier-Buchman; J P Marie; M Moerman; M Remacle; V Woisard
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  2003
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Therapeutic effects of electrical stimulation therapy on vocal fold vibration irregularity].

Authors:  M Ptok; D Strack
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Voice diagnostics in professional sopranos: application of the protocol of the European Laryngological Society (ELS)].

Authors:  M Echternach; S Arndt; M F Zander; B Richter
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Automatic Evaluation of Voice Quality Using Text-Based Laryngograph Measurements and Prosodic Analysis.

Authors:  Tino Haderlein; Cornelia Schwemmle; Michael Döllinger; Václav Matoušek; Martin Ptok; Elmar Nöth
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.238

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.