Literature DB >> 8323212

Comparative vascular audit using the POSSUM scoring system.

G P Copeland1, D Jones, A Wilcox, P L Harris.   

Abstract

Comparative audit using overall mortality and morbidity figures can be misleading as they do not take into account variations in surgical procedure and patient fitness. To examine these effects we have compared vascular surgery in two differing hospitals, during a similar 9-month period, using the POSSUM scoring system. In one unit, 255 patients underwent vascular surgery with an operative mortality of 9.4%, and morbidity of 37.3%. In the other unit, 89 patients underwent vascular procedures with an operative mortality of 20.2% and morbidity of 47.2%. At first sight there appear to be significant differences in operative outcome between the two units. However, analysis using the POSSUM system predicts a mortality rate of 10.2% for unit A and 20.2% for unit B (morbidity rates of 38.4% for unit A and 50.6% for unit B). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the two units (see Table III). POSSUM analysis may be of use in comparative audit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8323212      PMCID: PMC2497876     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  4 in total

1.  Experience with the APACHE II severity of disease scoring system in predicting outcome in a surgical intensive therapy unit.

Authors:  A T Edwards; K J Ng; A A Shandall; J M Price-Thomas
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1991-02

2.  Evaluation of APACHE II for cost containment and quality assurance.

Authors:  J M Civetta; J A Hudson-Civetta; L D Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  APACHE II in emergency operations for perforated ulcers.

Authors:  M Schein; G Gecelter; Z Freinkel; H Gerding
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  Risk evaluation in cutaneous melanoma patients undergoing lymph node dissection: impact of POSSUM.

Authors:  F Egberts; C Hartje; C Schafmayer; K C Kaehler; W von Schönfels; A Hauschild; T Becker; J H Egberts
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Comparison of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM in predicting mortality after oesophagogastric resections.

Authors:  J S Nagabhushan; S Srinath; F Weir; W J Angerson; B A Sugden; C G Morran
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Audit of vascular surgical workload: use of data for service development.

Authors:  P J Curley; J I Spark; R C Kester; D J Scott
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery.

Authors:  J Wilson; I Woods; J Fawcett; R Whall; W Dibb; C Morris; E McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-24

5.  Comparative audit: the trouble with POSSUM.

Authors:  S D Bann; S Sarin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Surgical audit using the POSSUM scoring tool in vascular surgery patients.

Authors:  J S Byrne; E T Condon; M Ahmed; R Conroy; D Mehigan; S J Sheehan; M C Barry
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  GORA: a scoring system for the quantification of risk of graft occlusion.

Authors:  G P Copeland; P Edwards; A Wilcox; P N Wake; P L Harris
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM as a tool for prediction of surgical outcomes in the Indian population.

Authors:  K Yadav; M Singh; Ms Griwan; Ts Mishra; N Kumar; H Kumar
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2011-07-31

9.  Outcome impact of goal directed fluid therapy during high risk abdominal surgery in low to moderate risk patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Davinder S Ramsingh; Chirag Sanghvi; Joseph Gamboa; Maxime Cannesson; Richard L Applegate
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Risk adjustment is crucial in comparing outcomes of various surgical modalities in patients with ileal perforation.

Authors:  Ravindra Singh Mohil; Tanveer Singh; Satyavrat Arya; Dinesh Bhatnagar
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2008-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.