Literature DB >> 11733590

Comparative audit: the trouble with POSSUM.

S D Bann1, S Sarin.   

Abstract

The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) has been proposed for use in comparative audit between surgeons and between hospitals. To assess its feasibility, POSSUM scoring was attempted on admission in all patients under the care of two consultant surgeons over a six-month period. Scores were awarded only if all investigations necessary for POSSUM were performed; investigations unnecessary for effective treatment were not performed. 815 patient discharges were recorded over the six-month period, with 521 patients undergoing operative procedures. Of those undergoing an operation, scores could be allocated in only 155 (30%). Scoring systems such as POSSUM are procedure-based, thereby excluding those who do not undergo an operation. However, most of our operative cases were also excluded. Full POSSUM scoring will often require additional investigations. POSSUM is unlikely to be of use in the wider setting of comparative audit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11733590      PMCID: PMC1282296          DOI: 10.1177/014107680109401207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

1.  Estimation of mortality and morbidity risk in vascular surgery using POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation.

Authors:  M J Midwinter; M Tytherleigh; S Ashley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit.

Authors:  G P Copeland; D Jones; M Walters
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system.

Authors:  M S Whiteley; D R Prytherch; B Higgins; P C Weaver; W G Prout
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  D R Prytherch; M S Whiteley; B Higgins; P C Weaver; W G Prout; S J Powell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Comparison of POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation for predicting death following vascular surgery.

Authors:  L D Wijesinghe; T Mahmood; D J Scott; D C Berridge; P J Kent; R C Kester
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery.

Authors:  J Wilson; I Woods; J Fawcett; R Whall; W Dibb; C Morris; E McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-24

7.  Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system.

Authors:  P M Sagar; M N Hartley; B Mancey-Jones; P C Sedman; J May; J Macfie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Risk scoring in surgical patients.

Authors:  H J Jones; L de Cossart
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Comparative vascular audit using the POSSUM scoring system.

Authors:  G P Copeland; D Jones; A Wilcox; P L Harris
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Audit of emergency preoperative resuscitation.

Authors:  B McIlroy; A Miller; G P Copeland; R Kiff
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.939

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Technical performance: relation between surgical dexterity and technical knowledge.

Authors:  Simon Bann; Mansoor S Khan; Vivek K Datta; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Development and validation of the Calculation of post-Operative Risk in Emergency Surgery (CORES) model.

Authors:  Naoki Miyazaki; Yoshio Haga; Hidekazu Matsukawa; Tatsuhiro Ishimura; Miki Fujita; Tadashi Ejima; Hironari Tanimoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Postoperative 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: development of a prognostic model using administrative claims data.

Authors:  S de Vries; D B Jeffe; N O Davidson; A D Deshpande; M Schootman
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Does the Surgical Apgar Score measure intraoperative performance?

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; R Todd Lancaster; Stuart R Lipsitz; Caprice C Greenberg; Matthew M Hutter; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Prognostic Value of P-POSSUM and Osteopenia for Predicting Mortality After Emergency Laparotomy in Geriatric Patients.

Authors:  Rebecka Ah; M B BChir; Yang Cao; Hakan Geijer; Kardo Taha; Sahar Pourhossein-Sarmeh; Peep Talving; Olle Ljungqvist; Shahin Mohseni
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2019-07

6.  Emergency Abdominal Surgery in the Elderly: Can We Predict Mortality?

Authors:  Anna E Sharrock; Jenny McLachlan; Robert Chambers; Ian S Bailey; James Kirkby-Bott
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Evaluation of POSSUM for patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S M M de Castro; J T Houwert; S M Lagarde; J B Reitsma; O R C Busch; T M van Gulik; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Risk assessment for cancer surgery in elderly patients.

Authors:  Hodigere S J Ramesh; Tom Boase; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Assessing the risk: Scoring systems for outcome prediction in emergency laparotomies.

Authors:  Deb Sanjay Nag
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2015-11-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.