Literature DB >> 2305938

APACHE II in emergency operations for perforated ulcers.

M Schein1, G Gecelter, Z Freinkel, H Gerding.   

Abstract

Most reports concerning the management of patients with perforated peptic ulcers suffer from inadequate documentation of the severity of illness and the operative risk of these patients. This study attempts to evaluate the prognostic value of the APACHE II scoring system in a homogeneous group of patients with perforated peptide ulcers, to assess it as a potential clinical and research tool for future studies, and to examine its usefulness in stratifying these patients according to their surgical risk. Our results confirm the prognostic value of the APACHE II scoring system, measured either retrospectively or prospectively, in patients who undergo emergency operations for perforated ulcers. When measured preoperatively, it accurately stratifies these patients to various risk groups and should therefore be used in future trials examining various treatment aspects of this condition. Our data, evaluating the results of various procedures in subgroups of patients stratified by the APACHE II, failed to support the superiority of one approach over another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2305938     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81225-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis.

Authors:  G S Robertson; S A Wemyss-Holden; G J Maddern
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Siriluck Prapasrivorakul; Darin Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Perforated peptic ulcer: "developing" world versus "developed" world.

Authors:  Doron Kopelman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Influence of age, comorbidity, type of operation and other variables on lethality and duration of post-operative hospital stay in patients with peptic ulcer. An analysis of 303 surgically treated patients.

Authors:  J Högel; R J Rieker; R Eisele; E Schmid
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1996

6.  Comparative vascular audit using the POSSUM scoring system.

Authors:  G P Copeland; D Jones; A Wilcox; P L Harris
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Lau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Supplemental immunoglobulin (ivIgG) treatment in 163 patients with sepsis and septic shock--an observational study as a prerequisite for placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  G Pilz; S Kääb; G Neeser; I Class; U Schweigart; A Brähler; O Bujdoso; R Neumann; K Werdan
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Identifying high-risk patients undergoing urgent and emergency surgery.

Authors:  W D Neary; C Foy; B P Heather; J J Earnshaw
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Risk factors influencing the short-term results of gastroduodenal perforation.

Authors:  T Wakayama; Y Ishizaki; M Mitsusada; S Takahashi; T Wada; Y Fukushima; H Hattori; T Okuyama; H Funatsu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.