Literature DB >> 8318636

Is breast size a predictor of breast cancer risk or the laterality of the tumor?

R T Senie1, A F Saftlas, L A Brinton, R N Hoover.   

Abstract

The relationship of breast size both to breast cancer risk and to the laterality of the tumor was studied among 261 women diagnosed with breast cancer and 291 control subjects who were enrolled in the United States' Breast Cancer Detection and Demonstration Project from 1973 to 1980. Standardized measures of breast area were obtained by applying planimetry to bilateral screening mammograms taken four years before breast cancer was diagnosed in case subjects. The left breast was larger in 53 percent of women with breast cancer and in 60 percent of women in the control group; the difference in breast area by laterality was significant only among controls (P = 0.01). To assess breast cancer risk, breast area was categorized by quartiles, with the lowest quartile being the referent group. Risk was increased minimally among women with the largest breast area (odds ratios = 0.9, 0.9, 1.2); however, the point estimates were not statistically significant and there was no evidence of a linear trend. Left-sided diseased was diagnosed in 51 percent of women in the case group. Although the mean area of the breast with the malignancy did not differ significantly from the opposite breast, cancer developed in the larger breast of 57 percent of women with left- and 46 percent of women with right-sided disease. Breast size was associated with cancer of the left breast but not the right. However, these size differences were small since the area of the larger breast was less than 10 percent greater than the smaller breast among half of the case subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8318636     DOI: 10.1007/bf00051314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  23 in total

1.  An appraisal of left and right breast cancer.

Authors:  L GARFINKEL; L CRAIG; H SEIDMAN
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Clinical and chemical studies in human lactation. VI. The functional capacity of the breast.

Authors:  F E HYTTEN
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1954-04-17

3.  Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis.

Authors:  C W Loughry; D B Sheffer; T E Price; R L Einsporn; R G Bartfai; W M Morek; N M Meli
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values.

Authors:  D J Smith; W E Palin; V L Katch; J E Bennett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Right and left breast volume and volume distribution comparisons in normal and tumor-containing breasts.

Authors:  C W Loughry; D B Sheffer; T E Price; R G Bartfai; W M Morek; M J Lackney; B R Bolyard
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1987

6.  Predominance of left-sided breast tumours.

Authors:  I C McManus
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-08-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  A F Saftlas; R N Hoover; L A Brinton; M Szklo; D R Olson; M Salane; J N Wolfe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The side and size of breast tumours.

Authors:  F Hartveit
Journal:  Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-06

9.  Anthropometric indicators of breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women in Hawaii.

Authors:  L N Kolonel; A M Nomura; J Lee; T Hirohata
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.900

10.  Breast size, handedness and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  C C Hsieh; D Trichopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Many Axes of Deer Lactation.

Authors:  Francisco Ceacero; Andrés J García; Tomás Landete-Castillejos; Martina Komárková; Francisco Hidalgo; Martina P Serrano; Laureano Gallego
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Laterality of breast cancer in the United States.

Authors:  H A Weiss; S S Devesa; L A Brinton
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Association between body mass index and localization of breast cancer: results from a nationwide inpatient database in Japan.

Authors:  Takaaki Konishi; Michimasa Fujiogi; Nobuaki Michihata; Kojiro Morita; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Masahiko Tanabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  A nested case-control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States).

Authors:  I Kato; C Beinart; A Bleich; S Su; M Kim; P G Toniolo
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Epidemiologic correlates of breast cancer laterality (Sweden).

Authors:  A Ekbom; H O Adami; D Trichopoulos; M Lambe; C C Hsieh; J Pontén
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Non-randomness of the anatomical distribution of tumors.

Authors:  Clare Yu; James Kameron Mitchell
Journal:  Cancer Converg       Date:  2017-12-19

7.  Breast cancer laterality and molecular subtype likely share a common risk factor.

Authors:  Shao-Ang Cheng; Li-Zhong Liang; Qi-Lian Liang; Zhen-Yi Huang; Xiao-Xia Peng; Xiao-Cui Hong; Xing-Bo Luo; Gao-Le Yuan; Hui-Jie Zhang; Liang Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Ethnic and age differences in right-left breast asymmetry in a large population-based screening population.

Authors:  Sue M Hudson; Louise S Wilkinson; Rachel Denholm; Bianca L De Stavola; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Bilateral symmetry of breast tissue composition by magnetic resonance in young women and adults.

Authors:  S Hennessey; E Huszti; A Gunasekura; A Salleh; L Martin; S Minkin; S Chavez; N F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Ralph Highnam; Nicholas Perry; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.254

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.